I beleive that the comparison between bike racing and triathlon is much closer, than the comparison between triathlon and hockey (mass swim start excluded!). What I meant was, drafting and cycling go hand in hand, so why does it get such a bad rap in triathlon. Triathlons, apart from a select few races, have never been pure time trials, as drafting in the swim is widely practiced and in fact embraced by so many. The strong swimmers don’t get criticized for sucking wake and not giving it their all, saving their energy for the later parts of the race, so why is this paractice so detested on the bike. Pure open water swim races don’t allow drafting, as per the FINA rules, but no one gives this aspect of triathlon grief. It’s all about tactics and positioning, which is entirely what the ITU is all about. I just think that it is great that triathlon has so many aspects to it and that all the different racing formats only enhance the overall profile of the sport, while breeding faster and more complete athletes. There should be more oportunities in North America for athletes to test out all the different race formatTs, from ITU style races, super sprints, F1 races and non-drafting races. These other formats are adopted and embraced in Europe and Australia with great results-and fun-times for all the participants and more importantly the spectators. What about team triathlons, where each member does all three events, then tags off to the next team member, there was one in Hungary this week leading in to the Tisjuvaros World Cup and it was a fantastic and exciting race. So all that I am saying, is that triathlon came about as a means of having fun and pushing oneself, so instead of trolling on new formats, embrace them and let the sport grow and develop-cycling does this, with crits, stage racing, time-trials, team time trials… and the various formats have allowed the sport to grow into probably the most exciting and hence marketable endurance sport. So why can’t triathlon get in on this? Let’s let the athletes show off their skill by using different racing forums and formats and the sport and the athletes will only benefit. As for a previous post, who claimed that triathlon lacks the “bravado” of cycling-there are plenty of egos, icons, grudges, friendships, and tales of bravado going on in the professional and amateur ranks, it’s simply that the cycling media has been around much longer than triathlon media, and hence knows how to sell a story. The TV coverage that triathlon gets is quit poor in comparison to cycling coverage, as it tends to focus solely on the person leading, without acknowledging the intricacies of the race taking place- During the coverage of the LTF it seemed like only Barb and Walton were racing, seeing that the show was tape delayed, they could have had a virtual “peleton” with splits, saying how farup Barb was in relation to the other women, how far back the men were… they gave the odd split, but neither the people I was watching the race with, nor myself really knew what place Walton, Simon, Geg and the other women were in, nor who was in contention-that is what makes it exciting, a little ticker counting down, to at least add a sense of climax. Build it up throughout the race, show some of the other men riding, show people suffering at the back-everyone of those athletes was laying it on the line and I am sure that there were some unacknowledged efforts out there, that went unrewarded and unrecorded. Everyone was racing to win, and some people payed the price of blowing up because of that, but it would be cool to have seen it happen, even briefly.
So that turned into a bit of a rant, but what the hey, I am pationate about this sport and want to see it succeed and doing that takes constructive debate and critical assessment.
Thanks for listening