I’ve used my existing bike (P3) on my Computrainer for the last 18 months with no obvious adverse effects at all. Now I’ve got a new bike and am proposing to use it in the same way (ie, indoors and out). But, from time to time, people comment that fixed trainers put undue stress on a bike frame (because they don’t allow for side-to-side rocking). To me that seems like rubbish unless you’re constantly out of the saddle and putting out 500+ watts. Bike frames are tougher than that.
Is there any science behind this view? Has anyone wrecked a frame on an indoor trainer?
Yes, riding on a trainer is VERY BAD for your bike. And for the trainer too.
It would be unsafe for you to continue to use either, for even 1 minute more.
Send your P3, and your new bike, and your Computrainer to me, ASAP, for extensive stress testing. I will take one for the team in this regard. I know, I know, I am an unselfish helpful kinda guy, what can I say? No need to thank me. And I will be happy to refund your postage too.
In a world dominated by self-absorbed triathletes, your genuine concern is truly inspirational. But I would hate to taint your noble sentiments with evil and vile material goods.
In a world dominated by self-absorbed triathletes, your genuine concern is truly inspirational. But I would hate to taint your noble sentiments with evil and vile material goods.
uh, huh-huh…hey beavis, he said, ‘taint’
It was a crack around the seatstay tube , where the carbon meet the titanium, and at the factory decided that it was a return. i just seemed like the paint, but they wanted to change the frame.