While I don’t agree with it, it certainly makes sense from a business point of view. I was at Tupper Lake last weekend, and I booked a hotel in Saranac for 4 nights, and the guy gave me a discount. All the places in Tupper Lake(well, there are only about 4) that told me they were booked months in advance when I was booking in April were stupid. They all had vacancies Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday, but not Friday night.
Consequently, they were turning away people like me who wanted to stay more than just the night before the race. They were throwing away a lot of money, and given that we are talking about Tupper Lake, I’m sure those places were not booked up the weeks before of after the race.
From an athlete’s perspective I agree with you, that is an unfair, monopolistic business practice. From the hotelier’s perspective, it’s just good business. You want to keep your guests as long as possible, and let’s face it, you have to stay somewhere close by for an Ironman event. In this case, we are a captive audience, so we can’t just go somewhere else.
As for IMNA, their main function is to make money under the auspice of growing the sport of triathlon. If this weren’t the case, you wouldn’t see Ironman bicycles, Ironman wetsuits, Ironman goggles, Ironman sunscreen…and Oh! wait, I just found out this week, Ironman wheels, and Ironman tires, and I’m sure that Ironman series IronGu is on the way
I’m not necessarily knocking them for this, but it’s simple economics. If they don’t make money, they go out of business. You can’t even call your race an ironman race unless it’s run/endorsed by them. I’m not even sure if I can legally use the word ironman in a sentence without paying.
It’s all about business. I wouldn’t be surprised if the amount of money that IMNA gets for holding events in specific towns is based partially on how much revenue it generates for the local businesses.