Wow, now I remember why i haven’t joined a forum in several years. Its all coming back. You express an opinion, and then an “expert”, who posts at least once a day for the last four years, gets his or her panties in a bunch and goes on the offensive.
So, even though I’m sure this won’t satisfy anyone:
(1) When the louisville event was announced, the press release stated that the course would be venturing into indiana:
http://ironman.com/events/ironman/worldchampionship/ford-ironman-louisville-scheduled-for-august-26-2007
If you actually go to the event’s home page, its the VERY FIRST article posted. That information is also, right now currently, “bannered” in the side bar. (just as a side note, and in further support of my claim of lack of organization / information, why do they have outdated, incorrect information right there on the home page of the event? “Do tell”)
(2) According to the information listed on the web site back in November, the course information was going to be available “after the first of the year.” I emailed mella On January 16, 2007 asking when the information would be available, and she wrote back to me saying “by the end of February.” Of course, the information wasn’t posted till April 27. Technically, that is “after the the first of the year” so i guess im just a Dick for thinking a five month delay is too long a delay or even a delay at all.
(3) What information would i like? Gee, I’d like to know my race number before I leave town so I can tell the few friends I have (remember, i’m a dick) what it is so they can check on me if they like. Oh, and how about a run profile?
(4) NA happens to run every other single Ironman event in this country, and have been doing so for several years. Silly me thought that such experience might be beneficial in organizing a race for the first time in a new location. I’m just stupid that way.
Bryce