Being in Illinois and not reading Chicago papers there have been a TON of folks pointing to Blago (Gov) as well as the typical Chicago criminals in office and how they are all related…well, today Billary mad the first claim to what most of us in Illinois know is on the way…Obama is going to be part of an invetigation as relating to Tony Rezco (sp)…I wonder when they (Clintons camp) will let the dogs run wild…the quoted “contributor” cant be anyone but Rezco (who Obama did work for). I have to maybe imagine that Obamas legal work was no more or less than that of Hillary at the Rose Law firm…
Obama told the former first lady he was helping unemployed workers on the streets of Chicago when “you were a corporate lawyer sitting on the board at Wal-Mart.”
Moments later, Clinton said that she was fighting against misguided Republican policies “when you were practicing law and representing your contributor … in his slum landlord business in inner city Chicago.”
If there is some “there” there, she’ll not just let the shoe drop but pry it loose and beat him bloody with it, even if indirectly via surrogate political leg breakers, leak machines, etc.
Not being in Ill./Chicago, I suppose I’m a bit out of the loop.
Is the Clinton camp for some reason waiting to let loose this scandal? How long can they wait for an Ill. investigation to start/conclude? Or, is there really not more to the story beyond Obama’s explanation that he billed 5 hrs as an associate doing work for a client that was partnered with Rezco on an unrelated project?
Is there a separate Rezco issue of Obama knowlingly taking/keeping funds from him as a contributor?
Hillary is right. Who is Obama anyway? i don’t understand why the papers aren’t talking more about who he is, his background, etc.
Hillary knows that people in glass houses shouldn’t throw rocks. She knows there is more crooked shit on her than what she can dig up on Obama. The Clintons are just happy that enough people are forgetting about all the scandal and bullshit for which she was involved, so they are going to tread very likely in that regard.
The press does not have time to dig into his past, because they are trying to find this so called experience Hillary has been bragging about.
Is there a separate Rezco issue of Obama knowlingly taking/keeping funds from him as a contributor?
Not 100% sure on the details but I believe there was some “Questionable” land dealings as well. Nothing that couldn’t pass for normal, but definitely not a “Bad deal” for O’Bama and not so good for Resco…if memory serves.
Personally I’m just more worried about his stances on many positions than the fact that he “May” be crooked.
Obama is going to be part of an invetigation as relating to Tony Rezco
I think you posted something about this a year ago and I have still never heard anything about it. I think the rest of the country probably couldn’t care less to be honest.