the current 'discusion " I am having with Dr. Coggan on the old thread were on this thread because i would be interested in how many people are really interested in this highly technical discussion and how many are zoned out.
I suspect the “interested” is about the same percentage who watch public television over the commercial networks.
of course, the number of views is only an indication of how many people are duped by the interesting subject header, not of how many actually appreciate the contents of the post.
“of course, the number of views is only an indication of how many people are duped by the interesting subject header, not of how many actually appreciate the contents of the post”
Yes – notice how many people have read “melancholy”
;-).
LOL. although i think after awhile most have a sense after awhile as to what the topic REALLY is.
I sometimes feel like these highly technical discussions have such a small following that it just pisses (I wonder if that word is in the spellchecker?) the majority of people off. Sort of like sitting in on a PhD thesis defense on “the effect of middle easter music of the 12th century on the 911 trajedy”!
Frank
mr day i am certain that my mitochondria are pushing up to 4.5 mmol per whateverthehell. should i be concerned ? tim
can’t stick the old forum’s threads here. have to start all over again. why don’t you start a thread by calling andy an ignorant slut and then take off from there?
Andy certianly isn’t ignorant.
sorry if this goes over all you young people out there. SNL
Frank
Actually, even though most of the discussion is over my head, I still find it fascinating (not to mention rather amusing)
:~)
.
i find most of the people here already technically “ZONED OUT” by default.
sad but true
I would have to agree, although at this point you to are going over the same ground repeatedly.
If you did not both hold advanced degrees I would say welcome to the world of science. In a system as complex as a person, getting a straight answer is practically impossible. Therefore we get the phenomenon were a paper can be found to refute pretty much any other paper.
Hey wow… this is an old thread.
I’m surprised. When I saw the header I was expecting…
I would like it if…all you ST’ers would buy my PC’s for X-mas. 
i love technical discussions. and i love pc’s