Hey, I answered truthfully.
http://www.howmany90yearoldscouldyoutakeinafight.com/q/v/fight90
25 - Not too bad I guess.
I’m such a woooos…only 16.
~Matt
I saw this once before, but with 5 year olds. IIRR, I could take 30 or so of the little bastards. The key was being willing to pick one up and swing him by the feet to use as a weapon against the others! 
I’m much too nice. Only 13. But to be honest, the thought of hitting a 90 yr old is quite repulsive.
24, but I preferred the 5yr old one. Kids are resilient, and would pose a greater challenge.
15 here. Sounds about right.
14 - more than I thought!
Further to Khai’s comment - I know from experience that fighting off a 4 year old and a 6 six year old at the same time is too much for me. Although if I was allowed to hit back … no, my nephews would still win.
25…I think that’s like 40 90 yo from Europe.
I got 27. But it would have been more if these senior citizens were all democrats and were whining about social security!
- But I think I really hurt my score by answering that it was sick and wrong.
Holy Shit, LOL!
I could take 32. I answered honestly, but I probably shouldn’t really disclose that.
But to be honest, the thought of hitting a 90 yr old is quite repulsive.
I guess the 90 year old’s are different where you are from.
28
.
24…seems about right.
I could whup 22 of 'em. Which, coincidentally, is the same number of 5 year olds that I could whup.
14
What’s 40 feet long and smells like piss? a conga line at an old folks home!
19 for me. There really is no need to fight 90 years. All you have to do is get off of their lawns.
- I would have guessed it would be less than 10.
I got 29.