How NO sees the fed help/Bush is officially a lame duck

For those govt defenders who claim that the fed gov’t couldn’t be doing better, you should listen to the words of NO officials on the ground. Let me be the first to say it here, this is going to do more damage to Bush than Iraq could ever have. Whatever political capital he thought he had, he just pissed away in two days. People will tolerate a bungled operation and a war zone abroad. They won’t stand for it here. This is just pathetic and very sad.

Local Officials Criticize Federal Government Over Response
By JOSEPH B. TREASTER
and DEBORAH SONTAG

NEW ORLEANS, Sept. 1 - Despair, privation and violent lawlessness grew so extreme in New Orleans on Thursday that the flooded city’s mayor issued a “desperate S O S” and other local officials, describing the security situation as horrific, lambasted the federal government as responding too slowly to the disaster.

Thousands of refugees from Hurricane Katrina boarded buses for Houston, but others quickly took their places at the filthy, teeming Superdome, which has been serving as the primary shelter. At the increasingly unsanitary convention center, crowds swelled to about 25,000 and desperate refugees clamored for food, water and attention while dead bodies, slumped in wheelchairs or wrapped in sheets, lay in their midst.

“Some people there have not eaten or drunk water for three or four days, which is inexcusable,” acknowledged Joseph W. Matthews, the director of the city’s Office of Emergency Preparedness.

“We need additional troops, food, water,” Mr. Matthews begged, “and we need personnel, law enforcement. This has turned into a situation where the city is being run by thugs.”

Three days after the hurricane hit, bringing widespread destruction to the Gulf Coast and ruinous floods to low-lying New Orleans, the White House said President Bush would tour the region on Friday. Citing the magnitude of the disaster, federal officials defended their response so far and pledged that more help was coming. The Army Corps of Engineers continued work to close a levee breach that allowed water from Lake Pontchartrain to pour into New Orleans.

The effects of the disaster spilled out over the country. In Houston, the city began to grapple with the logistics of taking tens of thousands of refugees into the Astrodome, and San Antonio and Dallas each braced for the arrival of 25,000 more. Baton Rouge overnight replaced New Orleans as the most populous city in Louisiana and was bursting at the seams.

The devastation in the Gulf Coast also continued to roil oil markets, sending gasoline prices soaring in many areas of the country. In North Carolina, Gov. Michael F. Easley called on citizens to conserve fuel while two big pipelines that supply most of the state’s gasoline are brought back on line. “Citizens should not panic,” Mr. Easley said. “But it is critical that we continue to conserve our fuel while Washington is developing a national strategy for this problem.”

Throughout the stricken region, scores of frantic people, without telephone service, asked for help contacting friends or relatives whose fates they did not know. Some ended up finding them dead. Others had emotional reunions. Newspapers offered toll-free numbers or Web message boards for the searches.

Meanwhile, the situation in New Orleans continued to deteriorate. Angry crowds chanted for help, while some rushed chaotically at helicopters trying to bring in food. Although Mayor C. Ray Nagin speculated that thousands of people might have died, officials still had no clear idea of the scope of the toll.

“We’re just a bunch of rats,” said Earle Young, 31, a cook who stood waiting in a throng of perhaps 10,000 outside the Superdome, waiting in the blazing sun for buses to take them away from the city. “That’s how they’ve been treating us.”

Chaos and gunfire hampered efforts to evacuate the Superdome, and, the New Orleans police superintendent said, armed thugs have taken control of the secondary makeshift shelter at the convention center. The thugs repelled eight squads of 11 officers each that he sent to secure the place, the superintendent, P. Edwin Compass III, said, adding that rapes and assaults were occurring unimpeded in the neighboring streets as criminals “preyed upon” passers-by, including stranded tourists.

Mr. Compass said that the federal government had taken too long to send in the thousands of troops - as well as the supplies, fuel, vehicles, water and food - needed to stabilize his now “very, very tenuous” city.

Col. Terry Ebbert, director of homeland security for New Orleans, concurred, and he was particularly pungent in his criticism. Asserting that the whole recovery operation had been “carried on the backs of the little guys for four goddamn days,” he said that “the rest of the goddamn nation can’t get us any resources for security.”

“We are like little birds with our mouths open, and you don’t have to be very smart to know where to drop the worm,” Colonel Ebbert said. “It’s criminal within the confines of the United States that within one hour of the hurricane they weren’t force-feeding us. It’s like FEMA has never been to a hurricane.” FEMA is the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Federal officials took pains to defend their efforts, maintaining that supplies were pouring into the area even before the hurricane struck, that thousands of National Guard members had arrived to help secure the city and that thousands more would join them in coming days.

Speaking at a news conference in Washington, Michael Chertoff, the secretary of homeland security, said that the Superdome had “crowd control issues” but that it was secure. He referred to what he called “isolated incidents of criminality” in the city.

Even as administration officials pledged vast resources to the region, Speaker J. Dennis Hastert, Republican of Illinois, told a local newspaper, The Daily Herald, that he was skeptical about using billions in federal money to rebuild New Orleans, given its vulnerability.

“It doesn’t make sense to me,” Mr. Hastert said. “And it’s a question that certainly we should ask.”

Mr. Hastert later sought to clarify his comments, saying in a statement: “I am not advocating that the city be abandoned or relocated. My comments about rebuilding the city were intended to reflect my sincere concern with how the city is rebuilt to ensure the future protection of its citizens.”

On Thursday, the Army Corps of Engineers was battling the water problem by finishing a metal wall across the mouth of the 17th Street Canal, the source of most of the flooding. Once finished, the wall was expected to staunch the flow from Lake Pontchartrain into the canal, which would allow the engineers to repair a breach in the levee and to start pumping fetid water from the city.

The federal government’s other priority was to evacuate New Orleans, Mr. Chertoff said. To that end, some 200 buses had left the Superdome for the Astrodome in Houston by midday, he said, adding that another 200 buses were expected to start loading passengers later Thursday and that Louisiana was providing an additional 500 school buses.

On the receiving end in Houston, though, the Astrodome looked at times like a squatters’ camp in a war-torn country. The refugees from Louisiana, many dirty and hungry, wandered about aimlessly, checking bulletin boards for information about their relatives, queuing up for supplies and pay phones, mobbing Red Cross volunteers to obtain free T-shirts. Many found some conditions similar to those that they left behind at the Superdome, like clogged toilets and foul restrooms.

But in Houston, there were hot showers, crates of Bibles and stacks of pizzas, while in New Orleans, many refugees scrounged for diapers, water and basic survival.

Thousands of evacuees, plucked from their roofs in New Orleans by rescuers, were deposited in a field in Jefferson Parrish, Sheriff Harry Lee, said. Sheriff Lee said that he had received no warning that the refugees would be arriving, and that they had been left without food, water or toilets.

The sheriff said that he was moving to evacuate the refugees from his parish but that he had surrounded them with law enforcement officials while the evacuation was being organized. “We’ve virtually made them prisoners,” he said.

One reason is that armed looting has extended to Jefferson Parish, which abuts New Orleans. Looters set a shopping center ablaze, and firefighters, facing guns, abandoned their efforts to extinguish the fire, local radio reports said.

The White House said Thursday that it would ask Congress for $10.5 billion to pay for rescue and aid efforts for the next few weeks. Senate leaders were expected to convene Thursday night for a special session to pass a supplemental appropriations bill, and House leaders intended to hold a special session Friday to approve the measure.

Joseph B. Treaster reported from New Orleans, and Deborah Sontag from New York. Felicity Barringer contributed reporting from Metairie, La.; Christine Hauser from New York; and Simon Romero from Houston.

Just listen to Joe Scarborough, Tucker Carlson and Nancy Grace…those republican commentators rre disgusted with their government for allowing a great American city to die like this.

Bill O’Reilly tried to tow the party line as long as he could until his on the ground reporter’s emotions got the best of him and he yelled at Bill that he didn’t have a damn clue what sort of armageddon was happening in New Orleans.

When this is all over we will patch the levees and rebuild the buildings but we will never address the real problem, and that is why are so many people in this country so poor that they can’t drive 200 miles out of harms way…why are so many poor people deemed expendible, not worth the effort of saving.

This country needs a major shake up.

People and officials are doing the best that they could. It’s the worst natural disaster in US history. Unfortunately people are dying. You can’t imagine the devestation in LA and New Orleans.

Officials pleaded with residents to evacuate. They did there best in opening the Superdome to them as a refuge of last resort.

There simply isn’t an explanation for an act of nature as catastrophic as this. To blame anyone for it does nothing to solve the problem.

It’s a tragic situation. New Orleans should have never been built in it’s current location.

More people are going to die due to mismanagement and imcompetence than died in the storm… how do you tell people to get away from that?

find me a location on the map that has never had any type of disaster. “dont live there” to an 200 year old city of half a million is not reasonable.

When this is all over we will patch the levees and rebuild the buildings but we will never address the real problem, and that is why are so many people in this country so poor that they can’t drive 200 miles out of harms way

I think you make a great point. That is the underlying question I have. I have lived and travelled in a few 3rd world countries, and NO looks eerily similar right now. There reallly is something wrong when we have billions to throw at foreign wars and not enough to care for our own. I’m not blaming any person or political party, but as a country, we have got to address this problem, and maybe this disaster will get people united and realize this mess. I doubt it, but maybe.

I really hope so.
My granma used to talk about “Truman’s eggs” when I was a kid. “Truman’s eggs” were the powered eggs US Army used to dump in care packages thrown around my WWII ravaged country of birth.
A bomber would swoop down and instead of bombs it would drop crates of supplies. Powered milk, eggs, meat, flower. Basic staples.
Millions of people around Europe depended on that aid to survive for a while after WWII.
As a country, USA was poorer then than it is now and still fighting a war against Japan.
As people, USA was WAY richer than it is today. Way richer.

Matt,

". . . why are so many poor people deemed expendible, not worth the effort of saving. "

Seriously, do you really believe this or are you exaggerating for effect? There are thousands or people busting their ass trying to get things done. Millions of dollars already pledged and $10.5 billion on the way. But you’re right, nobody gives a damn.

Hmm, Bush for once admitted that something is not optimal, that something more could be done. For him to make any such admission, the feeling that the fed govt fell down on the job has to be so strong. Not even that could be b.s.'ed by the administration.


People and officials are doing the best that they could. It’s the worst natural disaster in US history. Unfortunately people are dying. You can’t imagine the devestation in LA and New Orleans.

If you are going to rely on the federal government, no matter who is in charge, you will be miserably disappointed everytime.

This is really a bad situation. This country will have to do a lot of soul searching after all this. This ____ happens all the time in India, somalia, (insert country here), and only now that I see a third world country 3 hrs from my door step does this really sink in.

Officials pleaded with residents to evacuate. They did there best in opening the Superdome to them as a refuge of last resort.

It’s a tragic situation. New Orleans should have never been built in it’s current location.

How can you keep spewing this crap? You believe exactly what you find most convenient. I bet you’ve never even spent time in NO, and if you did you never left Bourbon Street. I’ll write slowly and use tiny words so maybe you can get it…No one planned to help the people with no private transportation get out. The Times Picyune wrote an article last month saying as far as the city was concerned the poor, the infirmed, the shut ins were on their own in the cas of an evacuation.

One more thing Brian, New Orleans is over 200 years old. You know, like Boston or Philly, one of America’s oldest cities. Historically, people build cities by big bends in big rivers. Wonder if you were saying the same thing 10 or so years ago when St. Louis was under water.

There will be an analysis of what went wrong - trust me, our congress is great at establishing “commissions” for such things.

I think one of the things you will see from that analysis is the government failed at all levels, starting with local, then state, then finally federal.

Local - they’ve been diverting FEMA funds for years and not building the levees properly. Local and state government has been suspected of corruption for many years.

Local - no disaster plan that planned for the absolute worse situation. No ability to have a command and control center. No satellite phones, etc. This is all on the lovely Mayor (who seems to be getting people out that HE wants out - see my other post in the convention center thread).

State - Blanco did not order the La. Guard in until it was way too late. She did not ask for the troops to be federalized - which is the protocol. She did not ask for additional troops before the storm hit- she only had about 7,000 guard and state police at her disposal which is not enough for a city of this size. The state was declared a national disaster area two days ahead of time which gave her power and authority to do much more than she did. She had 5 days notice before the storm hit. She had a day after the storm hit, before the levees broke - and made zero decisions. Then it was too late.

Federal - The feds did their jobs initially. I think with hindsight, it’s clear they should have federalized the state before the storm hit. I’m guessing they could have done that, even though it would have been unprecedented.

This is not political. The Mayor and Governor have cost many lives. That’s not harsh, it’s a fact.

Right, and that is what makes this such an outrage. Complete incompetence from top to bottom.


This is really a bad situation. This country will have to do a lot of soul searching after all this. This ____ happens all the time in India, somalia, (insert country here), and only now that I see a third world country 3 hrs from my door step does this really sink in.

TxDude,

Great post. It sums up my dismay at why so little was done before Katrina hit.

<<State - Blanco did not order the La. Guard in until it was way too late. She did not ask for the troops to be federalized - which is the protocol. She did not ask for additional troops before the storm hit- she only had about 7,000 guard and state police at her disposal which is not enough for a city of this size.** The state was declared a national disaster area two days ahead of time which gave her power and authority to do much more than she did. She had 5 days notice before the storm hit.** She had a day after the storm hit, before the levees broke - and made zero decisions. Then it was too late. >>

Brett

I agree.

I am not a big fan of the turning a natural disaster into a political soapbox … but eventually someone does have to answer questions about certain aspects (evac plans, poor levees, etc) … and it would certainly seem to me that it is not the president, but rather the local elected officials … and I do not care what political affiliation any of those officials are.

I am noticing that those that are going after the president rigorously don’t have the same fervor when seeking to assign responsibility to NO/LA’s officials. I also noticed that the president and the elected officials of NO/LA happen to be of different political parties. That bothers me, b/c it appears that perhaps all of the “search for truth and responsibility” stuff was just smoke and mirrors to attack a president that is not popular with a percentage of Americans.

That really disappoints me.

I agree.

I am not a big fan of the turning a natural disaster into a political soapbox … but eventually someone does have to answer questions about certain aspects (evac plans, poor levees, etc) … and it would certainly seem to me that it is not the president, but rather the local elected officials … and I do not care what political affiliation any of those officials are.

I am noticing that those that are going after the president rigorously don’t have the same fervor when seeking to assign responsibility to NO/LA’s officials. I also noticed that the president and the elected officials of NO/LA happen to be of different political parties. That bothers me, b/c it appears that perhaps all of the “search for truth and responsibility” stuff was just smoke and mirrors to attack a president that is not popular with a percentage of Americans.

That really disappoints me.

With respect to pre-storm evacuation, there may very well be some shared cuplability among local, state, and federal officials. Local and State officials obviously are primarily responsible for public safety in everyday situations, but FEMA and the Department of Homeland Security are responsible for disaster management, including preparedness:

http://www.fema.gov/about/history.shtm

“The Federal Emergency Management Agency - a former independent agency that became part of the new Department of Homeland Security in March 2003 - is tasked with responding to, planning for, recovering from and mitigating against disasters.” The reason that FEMA exists is because preparation and recovery from disasters like Hurricane Katrina can be very complex, requiring vast resources, specialized equipment, and often involves management of mutliple cities, counties, and/or states. The federal government can offer these things; most cities and states cannot. They simply don’t have the resources, and it would be inefficient and wasteful to expect each state to independently maintain the same abilities that FEMA has.

In the wake of 9/11, FEMA and DHS are supposed to develop plans to deal with a terror attack in a major city. The same things going in New Orleans right now could easily be the result of a major terror attack, and it is more likley than not that some American city will suffer a major terror attack sometime. It is startling clear that FEMA has failed, by doing too little, too late. Many, many people are dead or dying, it is apparent that we have done little since 9/11 to prepare for disasters (natural or terrorist) and the right is trying to shirk accountability once again.

THAT dissapoints me.

I am not an active political enthusiast, nor do I really align myself with a certain political party, but …

Many, many people are dead or dying, it is apparent that we have done little since 9/11 to prepare for disasters (natural or terrorist) and the right is trying to shirk accountability once again.

… honestly, it seems as if EVERYONE in a influential and relevant position is looking to shirk responsibility.

I keep thinking back to NO only having levees that could deal with a cat 3 hurricane, and wonder why they could not foresee something larger possibly coming (more like why it was not a more urgent matter … more below). From what I know, the fact that New Orleans is below sea-level and next to the Gulf and the prevalence of hurricanes in the eastern gulf area are 3 huge red flags that someone should have dealt with before the upcoming 2006 feasibility studies regarding upgrading the levees.


The same things going in New Orleans right now could easily be the result of a major terror attack,

Looking at all the major American cities that could be attacked, would NO be on the top of that list … when comparing size and stature of the large cities? I don’t say that to be cold or impersonal … but if I were leading Homeland Security, it would seem reasonable to put much of the attention on cities like LA, Chicago, NYC, etc. Realistically, Homeland Security is still in its infant stages. I am not looking to shirk their responsibility, but really, how much can be expected in two years?

It seems that if NO was in a threatened or vulnerable state that someone would have proposed it to Homeland Security. Does anyone know if this was done? Did they request the gov’t involvement in trying to get the levees updated, and other relevant plans in place?

Again, I come back to the feasibility studies that were to take place in 2006 … it seems that Katrina just caught NO in a situation where it was taking steps to be more secure, but just caught them at a really bad time.

I have seen on the news, that some groups are outright saying that the reason FEMA “waited so long” was because NO is a “poor black city”, and I am strugling to see the evidence for making such a bold assertion.

I am not sure how my posts are coming across. I am not looking to assign blame or shirk anyone of their responsiblities … only looking at what may have prevented this from being as bad as it is, or what could help prevent a future location from having an equally bad (or worse) situation.

Sorry, I am getting too tired for an expansive reply, but I started a thread a few days ago about the fact that Bush cut funding for area flood control projects, and has shortchanged them since 2003 in favor of funding his adventure in Iraq. Note this statement:

“One project that a contractor had been racing to finish this summer: a bridge and levee job right at the 17th Street Canal, site of the main breach on Monday.”

Art Franke, in his infinite wisdom and citing nothing, has already told me how wrong I am about this. But check it out for yourself. Here is my earlier thread on this subject, and the article I cited is repeated below:

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=520245;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;;page=unread#unread


http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001051313


Did New Orleans Catastrophe Have to Happen? ‘Times-Picayune’ Had Repeatedly Raised Federal Spending Issues http://www.mediainfo.com/eandp/photos/icons/Dollars_L.jpg

By Will Bunch

Published: August 31, 2005 9:00 PM ET
PHILADELPHIAEven though Hurricane Katrina has moved well north of the city, the waters may still keep rising in New Orleans. That’s because Lake Pontchartrain continues to pour through a two-block-long break in the main levee, near the city’s 17th Street Canal. With much of the Crescent City some 10 feet below sea level, the rising tide may not stop until it’s level with the massive lake.

New Orleans had long known it was highly vulnerable to flooding and a direct hit from a hurricane. In fact, the federal government has been working with state and local officials in the region since the late 1960s on major hurricane and flood relief efforts. When flooding from a massive rainstorm in May 1995 killed six people, Congress authorized the Southeast Louisiana Urban Flood Control Project, or SELA.

Over the next 10 years, the Army Corps of Engineers, tasked with carrying out SELA, spent $430 million on shoring up levees and building pumping stations, with $50 million in local aid. But at least $250 million in crucial projects remained, even as hurricane activity in the Atlantic Basin increased dramatically and the levees surrounding New Orleans continued to subside.

HURRICANE COVERAGE
Editor of Biloxi Paper Surfaces With a Column
‘Times-Picayune’ Finds New Home, Reports Looting
For ‘St. Pete Times,’ Katrina Coverage is a Test of Preparedness
Baton Rouge Paper Rides Out the Storm
Biloxi Paper Perseveres
Hurricane Blog, Day 3
Hurricane Blog, Day 2
Hurricane Blog, Day 1

Yet after 2003, the flow of federal dollars toward SELA dropped to a trickle. The Corps never tried to hide the fact that the spending pressures of the war in Iraq, as well as homeland security – coming at the same time as federal tax cuts – was the reason for the strain. At least nine articles in the Times-Picayune from 2004 and 2005 specifically cite the cost of Iraq as a reason for the lack of hurricane- and flood-control dollars.

Newhouse News Service, in an article posted late Tuesday night at The Times-Picayune Web site, reported: “No one can say they didn’t see it coming. … Now in the wake of one of the worst storms ever, serious questions are being asked about the lack of preparation.”

In early 2004, as the cost of the conflict in Iraq soared, President Bush proposed spending less than 20 percent of what the Corps said was needed for Lake Pontchartrain, according to a Feb. 16, 2004, article, in New Orleans CityBusiness.

On June 8, 2004, Walter Maestri, emergency management chief for Jefferson Parish, Louisiana; told the Times-Picayune: “It appears that the money has been moved in the president’s budget to handle homeland security and the war in Iraq, and I suppose that’s the price we pay. Nobody locally is happy that the levees can’t be finished, and we are doing everything we can to make the case that this is a security issue for us.”

Also that June, with the 2004 hurricane season starting, the Corps’ project manager Al Naomi went before a local agency, the East Jefferson Levee Authority, and essentially begged for $2 million for urgent work that Washington was now unable to pay for. From the June 18, 2004 Times-Picayune:

“The system is in great shape, but the levees are sinking. Everything is sinking, and if we don’t get the money fast enough to raise them, then we can’t stay ahead of the settlement,” he said. “The problem that we have isn’t that the levee is low, but that the federal funds have dried up so that we can’t raise them.”

The panel authorized that money, and on July 1, 2004, it had to pony up another $250,000 when it learned that stretches of the levee in Metairie had sunk by four feet. The agency had to pay for the work with higher property taxes. The levee board noted in October 2004 that the feds were also now not paying for a hoped-for $15 million project to better shore up the banks of Lake Pontchartrain.

The 2004 hurricane season was the worst in decades. In spite of that, the federal government came back this spring with the steepest reduction in hurricane and flood-control funding for New Orleans in history. Because of the proposed cuts, the Corps office there imposed a hiring freeze. Officials said that money targeted for the SELA project – $10.4 million, down from $36.5 million – was not enough to start any new jobs.

There was, at the same time, a growing recognition that more research was needed to see what New Orleans must do to protect itself from a Category 4 or 5 hurricane. But once again, the money was not there. As the Times-Picayune reported last Sept. 22:

“That second study would take about four years to complete and would cost about $4 million, said Army Corps of Engineers project manager Al Naomi. About $300,000 in federal money was proposed for the 2005 fiscal-year budget, and the state had agreed to match that amount. But the cost of the Iraq war forced the Bush administration to order the New Orleans district office not to begin any new studies, and the 2005 budget no longer includes the needed money, he said.”

The Senate was seeking to restore some of the SELA funding cuts for 2006. But now it’s too late.

One project that a contractor had been racing to finish this summer: a bridge and levee job right at the 17th Street Canal, site of the main breach on Monday.

The Newhouse News Service article published Tuesday night observed, “The Louisiana congressional delegation urged Congress earlier this year to dedicate a stream of federal money to Louisiana’s coast, only to be opposed by the White House. … In its budget, the Bush administration proposed a significant reduction in funding for southeast Louisiana’s chief hurricane protection project. Bush proposed $10.4 million, a sixth of what local officials say they need.”

Local officials are now saying, the article reported, that had Washington heeded their warnings about the dire need for hurricane protection, including building up levees and repairing barrier islands, “the damage might not have been nearly as bad as it turned out to be.”

Congress appropriates funds. Not the President. If you have a beef with money talk to your congressman or senator.

It’s so easy for you to blame Bush. It’s a cop out though. If you took the time to educate yourself on then you would be able to form a better argument.

You don’t think the President has a role in funding? He proposes the budget!

Don’t let facts get in your way. Turns out that the main section that failed was considered one of the best sections:

Also, it is far from clear that even if the proposed levee expansion had been carried out, it would have made any difference:

Even if the projects had been funded at the highest amounts,  said it might not have changed the situation in downtown New Orleans. He said the levee near the 17th Street Canal, where one of the breaches occurred that emptied water into the city, was fully completed.

Or if more facts wouldn’t prove too inconvenient, you could try this:

The 17th Street levee that gave way and led to the flooding of New Orleans was part of an intricate, aging system of barriers and pumps that was so chronically underfinanced that senior regional officials of the Army Corps of Engineers complained about it publicly for years.

Often leading the chorus was Alfred C. Naomi, a senior project manager for the corps and a 30-year veteran of efforts to waterproof a city built on slowly sinking mud, surrounded by water and periodically a target of great storms. …

“A breach under these conditions was ultimately not surprising,” he said last night. “I had hoped that we had overdesigned it to a point that it would not fail. But you can overdesign only so much, and then a failure has to come.”

No one expected that weak spot to be on a canal that, if anything, had received more attention and shoring up than many other spots in the region. It did not have broad berms, but it did have strong concrete walls.

Shea Penland, director of the Pontchartrain Institute for Environmental Studies at the University of New Orleans, said that was particularly surprising because the break was “along a section that was just upgraded.”

“It did not have an earthen levee,” Dr. Penland said. “It had a vertical concrete wall several feel thick.”


Not to worry though, you can always blame Bush for global warming and wetland destruction.