Here is an interesting group of articles .

http://www.bases.org.uk/newsite/pdf...ct book etc.pdf

Including:

Effect of pedaling technique on torque distribution and metabolic efficiency in cyclists - this study shows that pulling up is less efficient than ordinary pedaling. I would agree with this study, especially if it used subjects that had not trained to pedal in this fashion. Interestingly, one of the authors (Ian Mayhew) is a long-time PowerCranks advocate. I will have to contact him to get his take on this. I, of course, have my own thoughts as to how this says anything about PC use - it doesn’t.

Comparison of power output between Rotor and normalcranks during a 16.1 km time trial - no difference seen

Vascular damage in competitive cyclists from repeated mechanical stress (this doesn’t have anything to do with Chips problem but is looking at the iliac arteries - the hip area)

Relationship between gross, delta, and pedaling efficiency “They found that a significant amount of the force produced (~25%) during the downstroke of the pedaling action was used to overcome negative forces from the trailing leg.”

Power output related to exposure time in professional road cycling. Many will find this interesting as a way of predicting performance in long races based upon shorter efforts

Anyhow, I predict this has the potential to stimulate a lot of discussion and controversy.

Frank

Your link doesn’t work…

Your link doesn’t work…
Try this

http://www.bases.org.uk/newsite/pdf/Abstract book etc.pdf
.

I was one of Ian Mayhew’s test subjects int the pedalling technique study - this has been discussed on ST a while ago here: http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=930963
.

I was one of Ian Mayhew’s test subjects int the pedalling technique study - this has been discussed on ST a while ago here: http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=930963

I missed that. Mine is a repeat it looks like. It looks like others had the same objection to these studies that I do, that there was no adaption period to the new techniques.

Frank

I know Ian from the UK race season and read his paper when i was at a endurance sports science conference earlier this year. It made for interesting reading and the only bone of contention I had were the type and number of test subjects (I did not find it specific enough but then this is a common problem with a lot of studies not unique to this one).

bryce.