I’d venture that more races are won every year on clinchers than on tubulars, and by a wide margin. I’d also venture that more highly ranked or regarded a race is the more tubulars start to dominate the win column.
Indeed this is why I am only discussing the 3 most important races going on this year
I’d venture that more races are won every year on clinchers than on tubulars, and by a wide margin. I’d also venture that more highly ranked or regarded a race is the more tubulars start to dominate the win column.
the course has everything from short steep climbs, longer effort climbs, false flats, exposed flats, fast 2 mile gradual recents. I just feel there is no section of the course where a deeeeep wheel is going to provide any additional benefit. I’m not saying that it can’t be done…(it is very clear that is was done in her case)…I’m just saying that in this course, much less the state champs, a wheel in the 30,35,38 mm range could help ease some stress on the legs. That being said, the winner of the 4s was using 808’s I believe. I guess it boils down to what you are comfortable on in a race. People totally neglect the mental side of equipment choice.
the course has everything from short steep climbs, longer effort climbs, false flats, exposed flats, fast 2 mile gradual recents. I just feel there is no section of the course where a deeeeep wheel is going to provide any additional benefit. I’m not saying that it can’t be done…(it is very clear that is was done in her case)…I’m just saying that in this course, much less the state champs, a wheel in the 30,35,38 mm range could help ease some stress on the legs. That being said, the winner of the 4s was using 808’s I believe. I guess it boils down to what you are comfortable on in a race. People totally neglect the mental side of equipment choice.
Serious question. How do you reconcile Cervelos Col de Tipping point where they say that 200 grams less weight would be an advantage over a much more aero frame at less of a grade with your analysis?
that scenario was a longer climb, and thus at much lower wattage. in this race they were hitting 500 watts up the climbs. lower the watts and the balance shifts more towards weight
cervelo did something like use 1/2 the actual aero advantage of the s3 in that analysis, just to be conservative.
the lighter wheels ARE quicker in this scenario (ignoring aerodynamics, maybe still would be, I don’t know). Its just not enough quicker to matter. You would close the 1 meter gap right back up on the back side of the hill.
Serious question. How do you reconcile Cervelos Col de Tipping point where they say that 200 grams less weight would be an advantage over a much more aero frame at less of a grade with your analysis?
deep tubies would certainly be an advantage on this course, assuming you glue em right. less weight is good and you don’t need flat kits in a road race. We just don’t happen to own a deep rear tubie.
I’m certain this ends the clincher versus tubular debate once and for all.