I just started getting into triathlons about two months ago and I am looking to get a GPS watch for training. I need some input about what functions I actually need in a watch.
I am looking for something that measures time, HR, can set HR zones, pace (running and biking, swimming would be nice, but not necessary), distance, and track progress. At this point in time, Im not really interested in measuring transition time, run/bike cadence (have cateye on bike), indoor distance with shoe clip, or bike power/rate with mount (can I just wear watch on wrist and not mount it for rate?) Are there functions I am overlooking and should be measuring?
From what I have seen, pretty much all high end watches can do these things, so should I go all out and buy a 310xt/610 that will last me a long time through training and will have functions I will eventually need or should I buy a cheaper one and upgrade as I get to longer distance tri’s and more serious training?
Thanks
The trusty FR405 will do all the things you mentioned and some. I have used that watch for about 4 years now and have never had problems. Yes, sometimes the bezel is finicky but rarely do I ever need to use it during training or racing. They can be sourced on EBay for a good price, usually less than $200 I think. Also check Craigslist, my friend picked one up for a ridiculous $80.
BUT if you have the money get the 310XT
Cheap, big and fugly: Garmin 305
Nicer looking, fully featured, sub $200 Garmin 405 but if you run in the rain a lot, or sweat a lot, consider the 410 as the bezel has been improved for those conditions. I’m pretty happy with my 405.
the great looking Garmin 110/210 won’t have enough features for you.
As you noted, the 310xt will do it all, but is pricey.
If you can wait, Garmin will be announcing a new watch, possibly something touch-screen that replaces the 310xt in a couple months. If nothing else, the price of the 310 might fall.
if you don’t need GPS, and just want a good running/HR watch, consider the Garmin Forerunner 60. the footpod works remarkably well for distance/pace measurements.
the great looking Garmin 110/210 won’t have enough features for you.
Out of curiosity, what features do you think the 210 is missing? I use the 310 right now and am thinking of retiring it for the 210, which seems to do everything I need it to, but I may be overlooking some things. FWIW, I would be using it primarily for running as I use an EDGE 500 on the bike.
Thanks, and sorry if this is a hijack.
Out of curiosity, what features do you think the 210 is missing? I use the 310 right now and am thinking of retiring it for the 210, which seems to do everything I need it to, but I may be overlooking some things. FWIW, I would be using it primarily for running as I use an EDGE 500 on the bike.
Thanks, and sorry if this is a hijack.
What has steered me away from the 210 is its lack of a “lap time” display and limited execution of custom workouts. It does let you do very basic interval workouts but that is it.
Yea, no lap time seems like kind of an oversight. I rarely use the “workout” functions on my 305 though.
Thanks
the great looking Garmin 110/210 won’t have enough features for you.
Out of curiosity, what features do you think the 210 is missing?.. .
The OP specifically requested the ability to set HR zones. the 210 doesn’t do that, so that’s what I was referring to. It is a nice feature to have your watch beep at you when you get out of your planned zone, and even moreso to be able to set up a custom workout that, perhaps, has you warming up in zone 1, then progressing through a planned set of various intensity levels. It’s neat stuff- and very easy to set up on the more fully featured garmins with garmin training center (and the future Garmin Connect upgrade).
I love the packaging of the 210, and would love to own one, but I would miss the ability to program custom workouts, set up multiple screens each with a different set of variables to my liking. The 210 has a very limited set. It’s a great watch for sure, but it’s designed for simplicity and ease of use. It’s not for the data geek. I use the hell out of the features on my 405. it’s a hoot.
The best resource I have seen regarding GPS’s is here:
http://www.dcrainmaker.com/
I have been doing tri’s for about 14 years and just made the GPS plunge this year. Based on the site I chose the garmin 305 and have been very happy with it. At about $125 its hard to beat. I do wish it was more waterproof and maybe a bit smaller, but it has been a great value.
Best,
GS