Why is this lady always front and center with every shady woman who comes forward about some issue. From octomom to Cain accusers. She seems like one of the slimiest lawyers out there.
I can think of a poster in this thread that’s a bigger attention whore than her.
Glad you outed yourself. I always suspected as much from you.
maybe she is sick of the way women are treated by douchebag men who usually get away with it, and has committed her life to the cause?
is she more of an attention whore than the media hungry whores running for president right now?
is her cause less noble than theirs?
Glad you outed yourself. I always suspected as much from you.
BOOOAYH! Took what I wrote and reversed it. I did not see that coming at all. Well played JRenfro. Very clever.
No. If she was she wouldn’t be stating stupid lines like “a stimulus package of his own.” I go with attention grabbing.
if you’ve ever spent time living in the LA area you’ve seen her pop-up countless time with her shenanigans. It all started with Denise Brown.
Everyone who has furthered some cause has been attention grabbing.
again, every candidate running for president right now is attention grabbing, and make snarky statements all the time for the purposes of achieving their goals.
perhaps you just hate women and that is why you pick on this person?
=)
No. If she was she wouldn’t be stating stupid lines like “a stimulus package of his own.” I go with attention grabbing.
if you’ve ever spent time living in the LA area you’ve seen her pop-up countless time with her shenanigans. It all started with Denise Brown.
I don’t begrudge her representing women of alleged abuse or harassment, etc.
However, most reputable lawyers aren’t rushing off to hold press conferences and sit on talk shows.
Also, with this latest Cain woman. Maybe something happened 14 years ago. But even if it did, statute of limitations would seem to bar a criminal or civil trial. So really she is just trying to get herself media attention.
Additionally, why didn’t this lady show up 14 years ago. It isn’t if our country is free from racial prejudice. If a younger blond white woman claims harassment from a black man at the time of the incident regardless of the truth, seems like she would be believed a lot more than coming up 14 years later.
sounds like typical woman hating rhetoric. completely unwilling to understand their point of view. assuming the woman is up to no good if she is trying to make the issue public.
shes just to uppity right? wont let us men have our fun and ass grabbing. fucking bitch.
I don’t begrudge her representing women of alleged abuse or harassment, etc.
However, most reputable lawyers aren’t rushing off to hold press conferences and sit on talk shows.
Also, with this latest Cain woman. Maybe something happened 14 years ago. But even if it did, statute of limitations would seem to bar a criminal or civil trial. So really she is just trying to get herself media attention.
Additionally, why didn’t this lady show up 14 years ago. It isn’t if our country is free from racial prejudice. If a younger blond white woman claims harassment at the time of the incident regardless of the truth, seems like she would be believed a lot more than coming up 14 years later.
She’s a leftist political activist. Remember Meg Whitman?
http://www.mediaite.com/online/greta-van-susteren-to-gloria-allred-youre-blackmailing-meg-whitman/
Also, with this latest Cain woman. Maybe something happened 14 years ago. But even if it did, statute of limitations would seem to bar a criminal or civil trial. So really she is just trying to get herself media attention.
Additionally, why didn’t this lady show up 14 years ago. It isn’t if our country is free from racial prejudice. If a younger blond white woman claims harassment from a black man at the time of the incident regardless of the truth, seems like she would be believed a lot more than coming up 14 years later.
No kidding. Just like all those boys who were abused by Catholic priests decades ago. Why didn’t they show up then? They must be merely seeking media attention. The parallels are striking, yes?
Alred was a saint when she outed Weiner and Tiger, but now she’s a whore? Haha. She’s pretty damn sure of her facts we she outs some lying piece of crap sexual assulting politician like Cain. Say what you will about what is being said about the allegations, but once Alred is on the case, you better know damn well she’s got evidence in her back pocket. Cain is screwed.
Geez Yahey, calm down. Were you groped in the genitals by a powerful black man?
I know, this is getting too fun watching the train wreck and throwing gas on the fire. Plus I want Cain to be the GOP nominee. I would like us to focus on his 9-9-9 plan. haha
Not at all. First, what happened to innocent until proven guilty.
Second, this allegedly happened 14 years ago. White woman and black man. Odds were in her favor that she would have been believed.
Third, in your experience, there has never been a person who lies about stuff for their own personal gain.
Like I said, maybe it happened, maybe it didn’t. Time changes perception and memories fade or are altered.
Not at all. First, what happened to innocent until proven guilty.
"People! Please respect the legal process!
BTW, that witness is a lying attention whore slut prostitute."
Catholic priest abuse of boys is shameful. Different circumstances.
Not at all. First, what happened to innocent until proven guilty.
don’t know, you are accusing allred of being an attention whore when in fact she may just be a women’s rights activist who wakes up every morning to make a difference while you sit on the internet and bitch about her doing it.
so i guess innocent until proven guilty does not apply to her
What about Joel Bennett. I think most plaintiff attorneys like to get publicity wherever than can find it. It’s good for business.
Her track record is a window to her motives.