In this situation, we have 2 people -the OP and the motorist- applying the exact same philosophy in hill descending, except that the OP thinks it’s about getting around the cyclist.
Hmmm… when I encounter a vehicle “in my way” on this descent, I put on the brakes. I don’t swing out into the opposing lane (illegally) so I don’t have to.
Also note that the driver’s speeds in this instance were far enough over the speed limit to make them eligible for a reckless driving ticket. If they make a habit of driving that fast, then they will surely get one eventually. It’s a double fine area as well.
I’m saying that people are reluctant to put on their brakes while coasting down a hill. The speed trap near my home is ample evidence of that. That’s it.
Plus, I’m skeptical that you would hit the brakes if, A) the was no approaching traffic (<- important detail), and B) there was someone walking on your shoulder. Or, better yet, a car with it’s blinkers traveling at 5 mph on the shoulder. If you’re anything like me, I’d bet that you’d simply move over into the lane and give the pedestrian/ car more room. Once you passed the obstacle, you’d move back onto the shoulder area. There’s no reason to hit the brakes if, regardless of your speed, you had ample room to give space.
I don’t know about you, but I actually appreciate it when motorists move over into an on-coming lane and give me space on the road. I see it as a sign of mutual respect and I find it much nicer than getting buzzed. I wish more people would drive like that.
Yup, I prefer it when they give me lots of room when they pass. It doesn’t matter what speed I go, someone is always going faster. The only exception is when traveling by sport motorcycle, there aren’t many vehicles that pass me if I decide to go a bit hard on the sport bike.
And, downhill on my road bike, if I can get a draft I’ll take it. As arrow as I can be and spinning at 150+ rpm.