Is it good for cycling that the lab reports their findings to Le’Equipe?
Is it good for cycling that they seem to easily identify which rider a sample belongs to?
Should the UCI or the IOC have taken any actions after the Vrijman report that blasted the LNDD?
Do you think this report was accurate in clearing LA from the alleged positive EPO test on his samples from 1999?
They broke the WADA code several times so I dont understand why they are still accredited? Next year the TDF should do redundant tests at another lab to make sure they get the same results. I also like Slowmans idea of a athletes union that does testing.
The UCI and WADA need to take a long, close look at that lab. The mistakes pointed out by the Landis case are pretty bad.
Since the riders had to sign a pledge to not dope, the labs should sign a pledge to not leak results, and put up a years budget.