My first real go at stopping support for an artist based on allegations has ended somewhat poorly.
There’s an electronic music artist that I used to listen to a LOT, since very early in his career, big presence at Burning Man, etc. Then, in 2021, some pretty damning allegations came to light regarding ephebophilia, grooming, and interstate sex trafficking. Cancel culture obviously buried him, and the allegations were disgusting enough that I stopped listening to his music without a bit of regret. His only response was to deny before dropping off the face of the earth.
There was also a lot of collateral damage that came out of the woodwork separate from the main body of allegations - female artists he’d collaborated with accusing him of very unfair licensing terms and/or refusal to credit work, stuff like that.
Then, in 2025, it came to light that (allegedly) the underage and trafficking allegations were the creation of an obsessed and spurned male fan, who’d done an immense amount of coordination with some rubes to weave a tapestry of allegations that seemed impenetrable. Whoopsie. Cue “what happens when cancel culture gets it wrong?”
Then, on the flip side, all of that collateral damage about mistreatment of female collaborators and whatnot has never been refuted, so there’s that, too.
This thread has mentioned names that I had no idea were attached to any controversy! Side effect of not following pop culture very closely I suppose. Am I enabling by not examining the pasts of artists and actors and musicians and athletes whose professional output I enjoy?
There’s a spectrum with “sparkling human being” at one end, “directly did repugnant shit to other humans” at the other, and then a LOT of gray area in the middle, and that gray area is absolutely judged differently by our morality of the day. The ends of the spectrum are of course easy to deal with, and the middle is an absolute minefield. What passed the test a decade ago is radioactive today.