**There is way to much ammunition in the background for this to go nicely… **
Is that the signature in the lower right hand corner of that painting? Was it painted by JOHN HANCOCK?
But I am trying to figure out if this bike is too big…the saddle is fully forward but I don’t think I am on the nose in this picture…
There’s no saddle visible coming out of your behind, so I’d say no … you’re not on the nose of the saddle.
The stem is already at 90 mm
I’m not sure what you mean by this. There’s no harm in going another centimeter or so. I’m not sure you need to, though.
I am concerned that the armrest pads are too far behind the basebar (not sure if this is a bad thing) and my shoulder to elbow is not at an ideal angle…
Actually, I think your shoulder to elbow is pretty much spot-on. I study lots of photos of top triathletes and time trialists and it’s common to see a straight line from the shoulder, through the elbow and straight down the fork to the front hub. That’s exactly what you’ve got goin’ on in that shot. Sometimes the elbows are a bit in front of the fork, but the angle will still be the same. That depends mostly on the size frame the rider is on.
Your saddle does look too high to me. I’d like to see a zero-rise stem (one that would be horizontal to the top tube) to bring the bars and armrests down. You might try tipping those aerobars up a bit, too. (That’s just something to fiddle with to see how you like it. It lowers your elbows and helps flatten out your back. Some riders find “high hands” to be faster. Some don’t.)
A good test for whether or not those armrests are too far back is what happens when you jump out of the saddle and pedal. Do your knees hit the armrests? If not, they’re OK.
FWIW … I don’t think the bike is too big and you’re not far from having a pretty nice fit on it.
I’d like to see a shot with your head up as if you were looking down the road to see how high you hold your head. But that’s not an issue of frame size, obviously.
.