Based on this review, I say this should just about do it.
http://www.dcrainmaker.com/2014/08/training-platform-updates.html
This part is very cool:
“They’re able to automatically create a basic 3D world based on the video, or rather, based on the GPS file. This means that if you upload a GPS file from a ride (with or without video), it’ll create a 3D world that you can ride in. This 3D generation takes into account satellite imagery of the area (and other data sources) which then allows them to judge factors like vegetation density, housing density, and notifications of nearby landmarks.”
If they could use Google Street View, that could be very realistic.
It looks to be low-inertia though… or do these types of trainers have the ability simulate inertia electronically?
No ERG mode, thus its not even in the CT ballpark.
There’s erg mode if you’re using it with a KICKR…
There’s erg mode if you’re using it with a KICKR…
I’m talking about the BKOOL trainer, not the software
.
Lack of ERG is only due to software. That would be very easy for them to implement as the resistance is already electronically variable.
Am i reading that it will require a membership fee? Thats a no-go for me. My CT doesn’t require any further investment.
Otherwise it looks and sounds cool. But then again, we keep hearing about the next trainer finally replacing the CT in the market. But that old dinosaur is still there
Am i reading that it will require a membership fee? Thats a no-go for me. My CT doesn’t require any further investment.
Otherwise it looks and sounds cool. But then again, we keep hearing about the next trainer finally replacing the CT in the market. But that old dinosaur is still there
I’ve said before; if I was in the market for a trainer, I’d take a very close look at the Wahoo KICKR and now I think I would add this one to the list. So…in like 10 years when my already 5 year old CT stops working, I will take a serious look at those options!
I will admit that the software looks interesting, but the whole “riding the course” thing got old for me very quickly be it Real Course Video, Erg Video or any type of animated simulation. For me nothing compares to erg mode + Trainer Road.
Dinosaur the CompuTrainer software is, no question. Bulletproof the hardware is, IME (experience). I’d be interested to see 6 BKOOL trainers get the 2-session per day usage my 6 CompuTrainers do, day in and day out, and still function at 100%. I see a lot of plastic on the BKOOL hardware, and I’d be very surprised if they could withstand sustained commercial usage.
Agree. I’d like to see CT just stick to what they really do well and then partner with others on the software. I think that all trainers should go to direct drive as well.
Hum, what does this offer over trainer-road? Trying to get a power based winter training system…
I’m more surprised to learn that people still consider the computrainer something that can be “killed”. I think it’s already dead.
Trust me, I’m fully aware that there are legions of existing computrainer owners who will continue to use and stand by their units and it is by no means dead from that perspective. However, from the perspective of new sales and new users, I cannot honestly fathom why anyone would chose to purchase a CT for $1600 in light of the KICKR and other options available-- a conclusion that has been echoed in several DCR articles.
I’m more surprised to learn that people still consider the computrainer something that can be “killed”. I think it’s already dead.
Trust me, I’m fully aware that there are legions of existing computrainer owners who will continue to use and stand by their units and it is by no means dead from that perspective. However, from the perspective of new sales and new users, I cannot honestly fathom why anyone would chose to purchase a CT for $1600 in light of the KICKR and other options available-- a conclusion that has been echoed in several DCR articles.
X2… 5 years ago I bought a CT … Hated it from day 1 … spent hours and hours trying to learn the software …Yes the hardware is bullet proof but that isnt what you buy a CT for in the first place… Then my savior Trainerroad came along and fixed my CT … I literally spent minutes getting it up and running… When CT finally updated the software I didnt even bother… Looking forward to a Kickr or one of these in the future!
in the market as well, DC seems to like Wahoo the most. Saw a Tacx at IMMT and looked cool, DC gave the sense there customer service is lacking. Most people on this tread seem to be saying wahoo over CT. My biggest draw to CT is the spin scan. Do any of these others have anything thats even comparable to the spin scan?
I’m more surprised to learn that people still consider the computrainer something that can be “killed”. I think it’s already dead.
Trust me, I’m fully aware that there are legions of existing computrainer owners who will continue to use and stand by their units and it is by no means dead from that perspective. However, from the perspective of new sales and new users, I cannot honestly fathom why anyone would chose to purchase a CT for $1600 in light of the KICKR and other options available-- a conclusion that has been echoed in several DCR articles.
X2… 5 years ago I bought a CT … Hated it from day 1 … spent hours and hours trying to learn the software …Yes the hardware is bullet proof but that isnt what you buy a CT for in the first place… Then my savior Trainerroad came along and fixed my CT … I literally spent minutes getting it up and running… When CT finally updated the software I didnt even bother… Looking forward to a Kickr or one of these in the future!
100 percent of the time from May to Sep when I use the CT I don’t use courses…just erg mode…i get plenty of real world courses on my outdoor rides. In the winter, I’ll ride CT courses that I wrote myself twice per week. MY courses don’t have any stupid grades over 6 percent and any downhills more than 3 percent, so they have constant wheel speed and very little slippage.
Personally if someone asked me, I would recommend buy a second hand CT and just use courses once in a while. The big value is the good accuracy of the wattage, especially if you keep tire temperature constant. Mine tracks very well with my quarq.
I’m more surprised to learn that people still consider the computrainer something that can be “killed”. I think it’s already dead.
Trust me, I’m fully aware that there are legions of existing computrainer owners who will continue to use and stand by their units and it is by no means dead from that perspective. However, from the perspective of new sales and new users, I cannot honestly fathom why anyone would chose to purchase a CT for $1600 in light of the KICKR and other options available-- a conclusion that has been echoed in several DCR articles.
X2… 5 years ago I bought a CT … Hated it from day 1 … spent hours and hours trying to learn the software …Yes the hardware is bullet proof but that isnt what you buy a CT for in the first place… Then my savior Trainerroad came along and fixed my CT … I literally spent minutes getting it up and running… When CT finally updated the software I didnt even bother… Looking forward to a Kickr or one of these in the future!
100 percent of the time from May to Sep when I use the CT I don’t use courses…just erg mode…i get plenty of real world courses on my outdoor rides. In the winter, I’ll ride CT courses that I wrote myself twice per week. MY courses don’t have any stupid grades over 6 percent and any downhills more than 3 percent, so they have constant wheel speed and very little slippage.
Personally if someone asked me, I would recommend buy a second hand CT and just use courses once in a while. The big value is the good accuracy of the wattage, especially if you keep tire temperature constant. Mine tracks very well with my quarq.
Personally if someone asked me, I would recommend buy a second hand CT and just use courses once in a while. The big value is the good accuracy of the wattage, especially if you keep tire temperature constant. Mine tracks very well with my quarq.
It’s not bad advice but it really depends on how much you can get a used one for. I owned a CT for several years and sold it last fall for almost same amount that I was able to get a brand new KICKR for on a black Friday special. I would not go back to a CT now if you paid me.
The availability of more modern, capable and reasonably priced competitors will continue to erode the value of used CTs but at the same time they start to become more attractive as the price comes down even lower. There may be a time again in the future where I would actually recommend purchasing a CT but in my opinion that has to be at a significant cost reduction over the competition, forget about it being anything near a premium.
do you know if wahoo has a finance program for there kickr? im poor and the only reason i would get a CT over the kickr is the financing program…i can throw down 400$ and then pay 100$ a month which is appealing. Trust me the kickr looks awesome. tough call.
.
Has Kickr software gotten better for the PC? Or is it all still mostly ipad apps?