I currently have a Cervelo P3 SL with the generic fork that usually comes on it.
Is there any reason for upgrading the for to the Wolf TT or maybe the an Easton Aero SL for or even the Reynolds Ouzo Aero fork. I ask because I used to have a bike that came with the Reynolds and now I don’t. I’m just wondering if I would see any aero benifits. Not quite sure how much of a performance increase I would have if any at all.
Oh yeah, I tend to favor the IM distance races and my average times across the bike range from 5:00-5:15. I don’t know that much about aerodynamics therefore the reason I am asking the question.
It’s a fine fork. Stick with it. If you do change forks, be sure to get something with the same rake (43mm) unless you have something specific you’re trying to change about how the bike handles. The Ouzo Aero is only available in a 40mm rake at this time as far as I know. The Easton is a nice fork, but it won’t make you any faster- it’s lighter, but not any more aero, unless somebody has wind tunnel data to prove it. The other thing that most people forget to look at is axle-to-crown length on the fork- your frame is really designed around the fork it comes with. A few mm change isn’t going to be a problem, but it’s something to check. The axle-to-crown on the Easton is 364mm, but I don’t know what the Wolf is.
Anyways, just stick with the fork you’ve got unless you are a weight weenie who also happens to have $400 burning a hole in your pocket.
It’s called a Chord fork. It’s pretty good. I’d imagine the crown height is the same as on the Wolf, so if you did change, the wolf is probably your safest bet (but do double check with Cervelo). One thing to be certain is that any bike that takes a Reynolds will not run an Easton, and vice versa. They have like 1.5cm different crown heights.
But for that kind of money, you could buy a Renn disc (if you don’t have disc) or a really nice front wheel off eBay or any number of things that would make you much faster (aero helmet) than a new fork.