I agree it’s well thought out but I’m not sold on the execution of the in-frame bladder:
I have five… six?.. years on my Shiv Tri with integrated bladder. The Shiv bladder is much more “straight” without the weird kind the canyon bladder has. It also went into a much larger down tube through a much larger opening. The Shiv’s bladder is a pain to get in place and get unkinked so you can fill it up all the way. After you do it a number of times you get a feel for the process. I’m quite confident that the Speedmax bladder will be a nightmare to install and that you’ll almost never get the full capacity. Further, the Shiv’s bladder cannot be filled super quick. The weight of fluid at the bottom of the bag puts tension on the top of the bag partially closing it. I see this being way way way worse with the Speedmax bag.
The bento looks a bit small for me. YMMV
I’ll give them props on increased rear tire clearance. So long as that tire is on a wide disc wheel and shielded by the seat tube there should be no measurable increase in drag but with potentially improved compliance.