Canyon enters aero road market for 2011

****Canyon enters aero road market for 2011
http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/canyon-enters-aero-road-market-for-2011
The hourglass-shaped head tube houses a downsized (for Canyon, that is) 1 1/8"-to-1 1/4" tapered steerer tube…

the extra-wide bottom bracket now utilizes press-fit bearing cups (for which Campagnolo is apparently now offering fitments).

Cables have also been moved inside the frame to maintain undisturbed tube surfaces and a special Shimano Dura-Ace Di2-equipped Aeroad CF will feature its own internal wiring configuration and a dedicated battery mount beneath the non-driveside chain stay.

Rather than use exclusively carbon fiber in the construction, Canyon adds in more flexible basalt fibers into the Aeroblade SL fork blades and seatpost to provide more flex over rough roads. In addition, the seatpost setback is easily adjustable from 15-35mm (yielding effective 70.6-73.5-degree seat tube angles) and a clever interchangeable chip system in the fork tips allows users to choose between 39 or 44mm of rake,…

Size-specific tubing should maintain the intended ride feel across the range, and head tube lengths have dropped about 10mm across the board as a result of feedback from Omega Pharma-Lotto riders. Canyon says it also has a special integrated stem in development that will allow for extra-low handlebar positions.

Target frame weights for the Aeroad CF are 980-1,130g, depending on size – an increase of about 70-100g over a comparably sized Ultimate CF SLX. Thoma also admits that the Aeroad CF’s slimmer tube shapes produce lower stiffness test numbers than the ultra-efficient CF or CF SLX but stresses that its better aerodynamics will still make it a faster – and more comfortable – bike in certain situations.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_head_tube_front_side_600.jpg
Internal cable routing helps clean up the frame surfaces.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_transitions_600.jpg
Canyon says it focused on reducing frontal area and smoothing transition areas on the Aeroad CF to help reduce drag.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_headset_600.jpg
Canyon continues to use a special German-made Acros headset that requires no top cap.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_rear_triangle_600.jpg
The very thin seat stays contribute to the noticeably good comfort of the Aeroad CF.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_routing_bottom_bracket_600.jpg
Cables make a brief appearance down at the bottom bracket before heading back inside the frame on their way to the derailleurs.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_seat_tube_2_600.jpg
Canyon has passed over its usual Maximus asymmetrical seat tube design in favor of a relatively narrow and symmetrical one to reduce frontal area.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_seatpost_2_600.jpg
A mix of stiff carbon and flexible basalt fibers in the Aeroad CF’s new VCLS seatpost lends considerable vertical flex to the rear end. Setback is adjustable from 15-35mm.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_seatpost_binder_threads_600.jpg
Seatpost binder threads are integrated into the frame but Canyon says they’ll withstand over 12Nm of torque (the spec calls for only 5-7Nm) before any damage occurs - and even then it says the bolt head will snap, not the frame threads.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_steerer_600.jpg
Canyon steps down its tapered steerer dimensions a notch to 1 1/8"-to-1 1/4" on the Aeroad CF to yield a narrower front end.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_top_tube_600.jpg
The top tube is dead-straight but slightly sloping.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_top_tube_profile_600.jpg
Canyon frame designers perhaps could have maintained more top tube width on the Aeroad CF to gain front triangle stiffness.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/frontal_area_comparo_600.jpg
Canyon says the Aeroad CF’s 20 percent reduction in frontal area reduces its aerodynamic drag relative to the Ultimate CF or Ultimate CF SLX.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_head_tube_front_600.jpg
The tapered 1 1/8"-to-1 1/4" head tube features an hourglass shape to help minimize the frontal area.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_full_view_2_600.jpg
Canyon Bicycles launches into the aero road bike market with its new Aeroad CF.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_bottom_bracket_600.jpg
The well bolstered bottom bracket area helps contribute to the good pedaling efficiency when in the saddle.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_bottom_bracket_front_side_600.jpg
The bottom bracket shell is extra-wide with press-fit bearing cups - and new fitment options apparently include Campagnolo Ultra-Torque as seen here.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_bottom_bracket_side_600.jpg
Canyon extends the down tube just a bit further past the bottom bracket shell on its new Aeroad CF.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_brake_routing_600.jpg
A removable rear brake housing stop should make for easier routing through the top tube.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_chain_stay_600.jpg
Chain stays are similar in size to those of the Ultimate CF and Ultimate CF SLX.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_colors_2_600.jpg
Canyon will offer the Aeroad CF in white or black plus team and special Erik Zabel-edition colors.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_dropout_600.jpg
The Aeroad CF uses a new derailleur hanger that’s stiffer for better shifting and revised shaping for faster wheel changes.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_fork_chip_600.jpg
The uniquely adjustable fork rake allows Aeroad CF users to tune the handling to their preferences, from as quick as the Ultimate CF range to just a bit more stable.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_front_end_600.jpg
The new Canyon Aeroad CF wears a deep-profile head tube and down tube.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/canyon_aeroad_cf_front_triangle_600.jpg
Front triangle torsional rigidity on the Aeroad CF is noticeably softer than the Utimate CF SLX or standard CF, but the bike is also more comfortable.

http://cdn.media.cyclingnews.com/2010/05/15/2/erik_zabel_aero_position_600.jpg
German cycling legend Erik Zabel provided Canyon with valuable test input during the Aeroad CF’s development.

But interestingly, Canyon doesn’t offer specific data in terms of either grams of drag or time or power savings, nor has it conducted any wind tunnel testing citing discrepancies with various companies’ testing methods, variables with different rider positions, and even differences in frame sizes that can lead to incomparable information – comparing apples to oranges, if you will.
Instead, Thoma says Canyon has planned to conduct real-world testing on a track with its sponsored Omega Pharma-Lotto riders using directly measured power outputs and recorded times, a method that other companies and teams have already put in place and shown to be useful.
Sigh…I guess they don’t believe in wind tunnels…and that “diamond” shaped downtube doesn’t exactly inspire confidence that any drag savings will stay over a range of yaws…
Good on them for entering the “aero road” fray, but you’d think they could have tried to quantify things a bit better about the aero savings. After all, wasn’t that the point of designing the frame in the first place?

not aero

/fail
.

So basically they have built a new road bike but not really entered the aero road market yet. They might want to look at a few other manufacturers and see what a real aero road bike looks like.

The best part that I like is the Zabel helped with the design. He knows aero?

“The top tube is dead-straight but slightly sloping.”

Who ever wrote that should be slapped then fired. Do slightly sloping tubes usually curve or spiral?

Have you ever seen a Transition or a Look?

Nice bike, but Aero Fail. (yes I’m slowtwitch eye-ball aero tester certified - S.E.A.T. certified). :):):slight_smile:

I think it looks pretty nice. Eyeball-windtunnel test does throw some doubt on the all out aeroness; it’s no S3 or AR. But, it looks like a bike made to ride and handle well that had an added aero advantage compared to similar frames. Skinny seatstays/fat chainstays, tapered steerer, BB30 (or something else?) are all there, and the switchable fork rake and claim that overtightened seatpost binder bolt heads will snap off before permanent damage is done to the frame both seem like nice engineering. And, it certainly looks more aero than a Tarmac, SuperSix or Madone; just squashing the otherwise-massive downtube has to help the aero cause a good bit.

I think they should change the name from the Aeroad to the Erroroad since they made so many errors in the design process.

“Have you ever seen a Transition or a Look?”

Oh! Still think it’s a shit sentence.

Kinda pointless considering they do not distribute, sell and/or ship to the U.S. market.

Kinda pointless considering they do not distribute, sell and/or ship to the U.S. market.
There’s readers of this forum outside the US too.

Thought this was interesting…

Relative to the burly Ultimate CF and Ultimate CF SLX, Canyon say the Aeroad CF’s more svelte shape presents a 20 percent smaller frontal area. Intuitively, that should reduce aerodynamic drag, and Canyon engineer Vincenz Thoma says computer simulations have demonstrated that to be the case.

But interestingly, Canyon don’t offer specific data in terms of either grams of drag or time or power savings. Neither have they conducted any wind tunnel testing, citing discrepancies with various companies’ testing methods, variables with different rider positions, and even differences in frame sizes that can lead to incomparable information ? comparing apples to oranges, if you will.

Instead, Thoma says Canyon plan to conduct real-world testing on a track with their sponsored Omega Pharma-Lotto riders using directly measured power outputs and recorded times, a method that other companies and teams have already put in place and shown to be useful.

I think they were included in the most recent independent Tour mag test of aero road bikes. Perhaps a German speaking member can translate the article for those interested here.

-SD

Admit it - you giggled when you read about this “aero” bike.

It’s canyon’s version of the F117. It isn’t really aero and fast, but you will never get caught by a radar :wink:

Adjustable fork rake… interesting idea. A little scary ut interesting.

That bike looks less aero than my 2005 Madone.

Sombody needs to review their definition of “aero road bike” to include more than internal cable routing and a skinny head tube.

Brad

Forgive my ignorance, but what is the significance or advantage of no top cap on the steertube
.

Agreed. It looks like it’s from the Di2 school of solutions for problems that don’t exist.

Brad