No they can’t be real cameras w/o a MP rating. What is that stuff he’s selling antiques? I’ve never heard of a camera w/o that doesn’t have a megapixel spec. Serious photographers use cameras with 10MP or more. j/k I knew that these were film type cameras.
are you interested in just the body or the lens and back as well?
$60 for the body,
$100 for the lens, with the body i’ll throw it in for $75 (this is if i am thinking of the right lens, if i am wrong its worth more like 200).
30 for the back.
I have (this is off the top of my head), but i think:
50mm F/2.0 nikkor MF. $55
28(or 4)F/3.5 nikkor MF $55
24-48mm vivitar (with nikon mount) MF $45
70-210mm (dont remenber brand, nikon mount), MF ok lens, good for teaching someone photography, will let this one go for $30.
135mm F/2.8 (vivitar, i think, with nikon mount, MF, great low light lens, $60
Also an older manual Nikon FT3, will let go for $50
tons of assorted flash synch cords,
a flash handlebar mount,
Possibly a small flashgun
some filters
two individual camera bags
which 3 were you looking at (sorry posted a few diff times on here, just let me know which parts/bodies/etc you are looking at and i will get pics for you)
.
If you’re interested, I’ve got an incredible RZ Pro II system, 2 bodies, lenses from full frame fisheye to 100~200 zoom, multiple backs, and meter prism that I haven’t used in a couple of years…complete with lightware case.
which 3 were you looking at (sorry posted a few diff times on here, just let me know which parts/bodies/etc you are looking at and i will get pics for you)
The RB67.
i am heading home from school on friday, could you email me over the weekend and i will get the pics of them to you (i thought i had the cameras here with me but they are at home),