I try not to get involved in these ugly threads, but I feel strangely compelled to stick my nose into this one. I’m not sure why this thread degenerated so quickly into ugliness (actually, I’m pretty sure I do know, but that’s not important right now), but I think there is plenty of room at the table for both sides.
First, I don’t think that anyone can dispute that what Fredly is doing – giving his own time and money to help out a kid – is extremely admirable.
Second, I don’t think anyone can dispute that it is possible to train for triathlons – and even succeed at a pretty high level – with or without HRMs. In other words, it is technically true that they are not strictly necessary.
Third, it also seems pretty indisputable that overindulging (spoiling kids – or adults) can lead to a lack of motivation and poor behavior. That’s an easy observation to make. The difficult part is determining where the line is between enabling and overindulging. It strikes me that this line should be different for every individual, based on their personality, history and overall lot in life.
Fourth, everybody around here knows that people have donated their old or unused equipment, and even money, to other athletes on the board who are less fortunate. People will have differing views as to whether, in hindsight, this has been a good thing or a bad thing, but at the end of the day, the only opinions that matter on this subject are the opinions of people who have donated or are considering donating.
Given the above, I’m not sure why people gave our friend “Friendly Fredly” so much shiznit about his request. If someone actually has a downloadable HRM that they are not using, what would be so bad about giving it to Fredly to use to implement the training system that he likes to use? After all, he is the one donating his time, and he would like to make the best use of his time that he can. In addition, Fredly is the only one of us who knows the kid, so how can anyone else here judge better than he can whether this would lead to an overindulging?
Anyway, I think the bottom line is that it is appropriate to not to want to donate to Fredly (he even acknowledged as much in his original post), but I’m not sure I see why it is appropriate to give the guy a lecture and a bunch of crap about what he is doing. Please, save your rage for people with bad intentions. So there.