This strikes me as absurd or manufactured:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/Music/02/18/britney.spears.ap/index.html
So stupid.
Looks like a good PR / publicist team to me;)
.
Me too. It just kind of strikes me as odd. I mean come on, she let hotel staff photograph them for “personal use”. I wager the staff were paid well over $1000 each for the photos. A paparrazzi was paid $300,000 for a photo of Princess Di kissing that Harrod’s heir fella she was dating at the time of her unfortunate accident.
-Like the staff is going to use the photos privately…
Yup. Manufactured. They should have just released some nice publicity photos and hosted a one day “press afternoon”.
When you make your living as a public figure and bitch about “invasions of privacy”, that is kind of contradictory. It isn’t like the photos were intimate in nature. They were of them having lunch.
If we quit talking about her she will go away. Try it, it worked for Vanilla Ice…
What’s with the little dog? Is that a blatant Paris Hilton ripofff?
One of the celebrity self important award shows was in town a month or two back, and my wife saw her at ruth’s chris steak house. jamie (my wife) was dining with a few of her veterinarian collegaues at the pharmaceutical companies info-dinner. brittany had an entourage with her.
jamie said she is fairly ordinanry looking in public, and she probably wouldn’t have recognized her had the wait staff not been whispering about the celebs in house. jamie (who is not a fan, but not a playa hata either): “Kind of a mousy looking blond with big boobs and bad skin. vegas is full of girls who are much better looking.”
dman, i love the cult of celebrity. or is it cele-brittany.