While it pains me to admit this, I am indeed a tax accountant. On an even sadder note, I seem to be a much better tax accountant than triathlete. The situation you guys describe is common. Some guy saying he figured out a way to get otherwise “personal” expenditures deductible as business expenses. Sounds too good to be true, right? It is…
Under IRC Sec. 183, the tax law dictates that any activities “not engaged in for profit” may NOT generate a loss. These are commonly referred to as the “hobby loss” rules. I know what you are going to say. Here’s where you get defensive and insist, “Trying to become a professional athlete is NOT a hobby.” You picture hobbies as stamp collecting, bird watching, and the occasional cow tip. Well, the IRS disagrees with you.
The regulations and several decades of case law have determined the factors used to figure out what is a business and what is a hobby. Most damning to triathletes are the following:
-
Profit Motive. You must be able to show the IRS that you reasonably anticipate being able to produce a profit from your activity. In the case of most triathletes, the relatively meager winnings compared to the astronomical cost of equipment will rather quickly end this argument.
-
Profit History. This is where you hear the 3 in 5 year safe harbor. The IRS wants to see that you have been profitable. Even showing the profit years doesn’t guarantee you the result you want however, as the IRS often sees through these results as contrived.
-
Financial Situation. In short, if you have a full-time job paying you $70,000, and in your off-time you are pursuing professional status, the IRS isn’t going to buy it. If you are going to make the case that pro triathlete is your business, it better be the ONLY thing you do.
-
Level on enjoyment or recreation taken from the activity. Believe it or not, the more you love your side activity, the less likely the IRS is to buy that it is “engaged in for profit.” While no IRS cases have been litigated against triathletes, this factor has killed any number of Amway salesmen, who wrote off all their dinner parties and conferences and shit like that. The IRS held that these guys were pursuing personal activities and deriving personal pleasure, and that made it a hobby.
In summary, there is a LONG case history regarding hobby losses, and it rarely goes well for the taxpayer.
So, after all that, can the average triathlete who wins no prize money deduct his speedos and cliff shots? No, because it is a hobby, and that would generate a LOSS.
OK, well can someone who wins some cash deduct these same costs? Yes, but ONLY TO THE EXTENT OF THE WINNINGS.
Now, here’s the kicker. The income is reported on page 1. The deductions, on the other hand, are “other miscellaneous itemized deductions.” So if you don’t itemize, you’re screwed, but you still have to report the income. And even if you do itemize, the expenses are only deductible to the extent they exceed 2% of your adjusted gross income. So you may not actually reduce your income to zero.
In other words, you’re screwed. Just the way the IRS likes it.