Are female triathletes too flat?

Triathlon Forum
1

in general are they too flat?

2

Are you talking about chests or stomachs?

3

for what? hill repeats?

4

I can’t believe you actually posted this.

But, to answer the question - for Tom, yes; for everyone else, no.

Honestly, what do you need all the extra baggage for?

5

duh. what do you think?

6

They might be flat and you still can’t climb one…

7

While I have my preferences on body type, I find enough pleasing eye candy within the tri community just the way it is. But when it comes down to it, it’s the whole package that counts (what catches your eye as wel as your intellect and soul), not any particular body part.

8

See this thread:

http://forum.slowtwitch.com/gforum.cgi?post=501102;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;
.

9

I think he may be talking about feet.

10

No, that I do beg to differ…

It is all about quality not quantity. I would always differ to quality. And while to each his own, I am a fan of natural as opposed to reduced or augmented FWIW.

11

Hey I was a D cup for years, and all that running made life pretty miserable. Post-bebe, I am a more manageable and less-painful C cup. And my hooters still look fab.

thanks

12

Language police…

Tom, look up the difference between “differ” and “defer.”

13

Coming from a swimming background, where most the curve ladies had a HUGE disadvantage I would say, no they aren’t too flat…too flat, too big, skinny, curvy, fake, 100% homegrown, got to admit I enjoy the look of all of them, especially if they are fit.

-bcreager

14

it’s the whole package that counts (what catches your eye as wel as your intellect and soul), not any particular body part.

No, no, no… You have this all wrong…

It’s all about 1 body part… You decide which one…