Anybody have an elevation profile of the Kanc?

Triathlon Forum
1

looking for an elevation profile of the kangamangus in Conway NH. rt 112 i believe.
heading there for a vacation, so any info on road conditions would be appreciated.
and, just out of curiosity, if anybody has done Mt Mitchell - how would you compare the two.
obviously, Mt Mitchell is much harder, but how much?

thanks

2

the name just sounds hard - you can use this to make your own profiles

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/
.

3

I was just up there a couple of weeks ago to do the Mt. Washington century. Great riding, but weather conditions can change pretty quickly. Make sure you bring warm clothes. The first day we road the length of the Kangamangus, so let me know if you have any specific. There is a decent amount of elevation gain, but percent grade is lower than what I am used to, so I did not have much trouble.

Jeff

4

http://trail.motionbased.com/trail/activity/3257188#

http://www.northeastcycling.com/Gap_Climbs.html

http://www.northeastcycling.com/nh_me_gaps1_LR.jpg
.

5

Howdy,

Reach The Beach this year is headed to the Canc…they have a pretty good profile of it here.

http://www.rtbrelay.com/images/maps/3.pdf

If you were up for more of an epic ride I’d do up the Canc > Kinsman as outlined here >>
http://www.bikely.com/maps/bike-path/Kancamagus-loop-with-Kinsman-Notch

Enjoy your trip to the White Mountains!

6

thanks all,

bpq; do i read this right: 4,208 ft of vertical climb/descent and 2,200 ft elevation change.
doesn’t sound so bad…
thanks