Another Nominee, More Tax Issues

Yeah, I would love to take more of a mortage interest deduction than I’m entitled to as well Governor.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D979CMGO0&show_article=1

WASHINGTON (AP) - Health and Human Services nominee Kathleen Sebelius recently corrected three years of tax returns and paid more than $7,000 in back taxes after finding “unintentional errors”—the latest tax troubles for an Obama administration nominee.
The Kansas governor explained the changes to senators in a letter dated Tuesday that the administration released. She said they involved charitable contributions, the sale of a home and business expenses.

Sebelius said she filed the amended returns as soon as the errors were discovered by an accountant she hired to scrub her taxes in preparation for her confirmation hearings. She and her husband, Gary, a federal magistrate judge in Kansas, paid a total of $7,040 in back taxes and $878 in interest to amend returns from 2005-2007.
Asked by The Associated Press to comment on the amended tax returns as she left a Capitol Hill restaurant Tuesday night, Sebelius said, “We put out a statement and the statement speaks for itself.”

Several Obama administration nominees have run into tax troubles, notably the president’s first nominee for HHS secretary, former Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle. He withdrew from consideration while apologizing for failing to pay $140,000 in taxes and interest.

Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., quickly issued a statement supporting Sebelius.

“Congress is going to need a strong partner at the Department of Health and Human Services to achieve comprehensive health reform this year, and we have that partner in Gov. Sebelius,” Baucus said. “There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that Gov. Sebelius has the political experience, determination, and bipartisan work ethic to get the job done with Congress this year. She’s the right person for the job.”
There was no comment from the White House.

Sebelius is to appear Thursday before Baucus’ committee, which will vote on sending her nomination to the full Senate. Sebelius testified Tuesday before the Senate’s Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee before the tax issue became public, getting a friendly reception.
Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the top Republican on the Finance Committee, said through a spokeswoman that he is reserving judgment until the vetting process, including the nomination hearing, is completed.

In her letter to Baucus and Grassley, Sebelius wrote that the accountant discovered these errors:
_Charitable contributions over $250 are supposed to include an acknowledgment letter from the charity in order for a deduction to be taken. Out of 49 charitable contributions made, three letters couldn’t be found.

_Sebelius and her husband took deductions for mortgage interest that they weren’t entitled to. The couple sold their home in 2006 for less than what they owed on the mortgage. They continued to make payments on the mortgage, including interest. But since they no longer owned the home they weren’t entitled to take deductions for the interest. The same thing happened with a home improvement loan. Sebelius said they “mistakenly believed” the payments were still deductible.
_Insufficient documentation was found for some business expense deductions.

An administration official said Sebelius filed the amended returns before documents formalizing her nomination were sent to the Finance Committee. Sebelius advised the committee of the mistakes, and senators requested an explanation, said the official, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.
In a letter to Sebelius dated Tuesday, Baucus and Grassley wrote that they’d reviewed the three years of amended returns and “no additional items were identified that needed to be addressed.”


She’s too big to fail.

In her letter to Baucus and Grassley, Sebelius wrote that the accountant discovered these errors:
_Charitable contributions over $250 are supposed to include an acknowledgment letter from the charity in order for a deduction to be taken. Out of 49 charitable contributions made, three letters couldn’t be found.

_Sebelius and her husband took deductions for mortgage interest that they weren’t entitled to. The couple sold their home in 2006 for less than what they owed on the mortgage. They continued to make payments on the mortgage, including interest. But since they no longer owned the home they weren’t entitled to take deductions for the interest. The same thing happened with a home improvement loan. Sebelius said they “mistakenly believed” the payments were still deductible.
_Insufficient documentation was found for some business expense deductions.

You gotta be kidding me. “Tax issues.” For that?

Congrats, you have joined my buzzkill list. This place is getting more and more insane every day.

well, if she were an everyday citizen and the IRS caught on to this, they would probably threaten felony charges and prison time if not remedied quickly. so yes it is a tax issue. She knew it was an issue, hence the reopening of the file and settlement.

In her letter to Baucus and Grassley, Sebelius wrote that the accountant discovered these errors:
_Charitable contributions over $250 are supposed to include an acknowledgment letter from the charity in order for a deduction to be taken. Out of 49 charitable contributions made, three letters couldn’t be found.

_Sebelius and her husband took deductions for mortgage interest that they weren’t entitled to. The couple sold their home in 2006 for less than what they owed on the mortgage. They continued to make payments on the mortgage, including interest. But since they no longer owned the home they weren’t entitled to take deductions for the interest. The same thing happened with a home improvement loan. Sebelius said they “mistakenly believed” the payments were still deductible.
_Insufficient documentation was found for some business expense deductions.

You gotta be kidding me. “Tax issues.” For that?

Congrats, you have joined my buzzkill list. This place is getting more and more insane every day.

Insane? For what, pointing out yet another nominee that cheated on their taxes and got caught? I guess to some, cheating the tax code is ok. Of course this was simply an oversight, a mere lapse in judgement.

Congrats to you as well, given your reponse I’m going to put you on my “Most inclined to commit tax fraud” list.

In her letter to Baucus and Grassley, Sebelius wrote that the accountant discovered these errors:
_Charitable contributions over $250 are supposed to include an acknowledgment letter from the charity in order for a deduction to be taken. Out of 49 charitable contributions made, three letters couldn’t be found.

_Sebelius and her husband took deductions for mortgage interest that they weren’t entitled to. The couple sold their home in 2006 for less than what they owed on the mortgage. They continued to make payments on the mortgage, including interest. But since they no longer owned the home they weren’t entitled to take deductions for the interest. The same thing happened with a home improvement loan. Sebelius said they “mistakenly believed” the payments were still deductible.
_Insufficient documentation was found for some business expense deductions.

You gotta be kidding me. “Tax issues.” For that?

Congrats, you have joined my buzzkill list. This place is getting more and more insane every day.

Insane? For what, pointing out yet another nominee that cheated on their taxes and got caught? I guess to some, cheating the tax code is ok. Of course this was simply an oversight, a mere lapse in judgement.

Congrats to you as well, given your reponse I’m going to put you on my “Most inclined to commit tax fraud” list.

Yeah, they cheated. They found a way to avoid $7,000 in taxes over three years. I’m sure that made a huge difference in their lifestyle. Did you actually look at the mistakes listed in your post? And you came to the conclusion that they made a considered effort to cheat?

Yes, that’s insane.

***Yeah, they cheated. They found a way to avoid $7,000 in taxes over three years. I’m sure that made a huge difference in their lifestyle. Did you actually look at the mistakes listed in your post? And you came to the conclusion that they made a considered effort to cheat? ***



Doesn’t rise to the level of “cheated”…at least not for me. Hell, I didn’t know that the mortgage interest wasn’t deductible once the home had been sold! Looks like she was smart in having her returns scrubbed and then paid the piper as soon as it was brought to her attention.

Smart move.

I sold a vacation home two years ago. I should have kept taking the mortgage deduction. Dangit!

I am definitely delaring my limo services now.

Scandalous.

Not quite on the level with the president buying his family a swing set, but close.

In her letter to Baucus and Grassley, Sebelius wrote that the accountant discovered these errors:
_Charitable contributions over $250 are supposed to include an acknowledgment letter from the charity in order for a deduction to be taken. Out of 49 charitable contributions made, three letters couldn’t be found.

_Sebelius and her husband took deductions for mortgage interest that they weren’t entitled to. The couple sold their home in 2006 for less than what they owed on the mortgage. They continued to make payments on the mortgage, including interest. But since they no longer owned the home they weren’t entitled to take deductions for the interest. The same thing happened with a home improvement loan. Sebelius said they “mistakenly believed” the payments were still deductible.
_Insufficient documentation was found for some business expense deductions.

You gotta be kidding me. “Tax issues.” For that?

Congrats, you have joined my buzzkill list. This place is getting more and more insane every day.

Insane? For what, pointing out yet another nominee that cheated on their taxes and got caught? I guess to some, cheating the tax code is ok. Of course this was simply an oversight, a mere lapse in judgement.

Congrats to you as well, given your reponse I’m going to put you on my “Most inclined to commit tax fraud” list.

Yeah, they cheated. They found a way to avoid $7,000 in taxes over three years. I’m sure that made a huge difference in their lifestyle. Did you actually look at the mistakes listed in your post? And you came to the conclusion that they made a considered effort to cheat?

Yes, that’s insane.

My wife and I take deductions for charitable contributions and we also have small business expenses that we deduct.

But guess what?

If we don’t have the paperwork to back it up WE DON’T TAKE THE DEDUCTION.

This is not friggin rocket science, it’s common sense and knowing the difference between right and wrong.

But your right, the amount is insignificant, it’s the larger picture that has emerged with all these nominees–how many are we up to now, maybe someone could compile a list–that is the kicker.

Here you have the the liberal elite dictating that we must spread the wealth, that we must sacrifice during these tough times, and that we must pay taxes because doing so represents being a good American.

Yet, we find through nominee after nominee that these same blow-hards, these lecturing fools, are cheating the very system that they seek to impose on us.

The irony of the situation is spectacular, yet, apparently lost on some.

So you may think this is all trivial nitpicking, but rest assured, there are plenty of people out there that see this for exactly what it is.

You would too if took your head out of the sand and came up for a few minutes of air.

What this really shows is alot of their character…which is sadly lacking. But character doesn’t matter anymore so its all good.

Just ask Joe the plumber about taxes
.

I suppose all the critics dutifully pay sales tax on out-of-state purchases, right?

You have no idea what you are talking about. $7,000 over 3 years for these mistakes would not result in a felony charge for anyone. I am a tax atty practicing for 17 years, and I didn’t know the one about the mortgage after you sold your house. I would have assumed I could take that deduction too. 3 missing charitable contribution letters out of 49? That’s nothing.

And I bet she didn’t know of the issue. Considering the tax problems the other nominees have had, this was just smart to do on her part.

I voted for McCain, I don’t think Obama is the right choice, I fear what will happen to our country. But Jesus, all this crap with throwing up whatever you can find just makes people look idiotic and obsessive. There are enough legitimate reasons to question Obama and his policies, wasting time on this just makes the Right look stupid.

… I am a tax atty practicing for 17 years, and I didn’t know the one about the mortgage after you sold your house. I would have assumed I could take that deduction too. …
I guess then you are not very good at what you do. Not passing judgment just saying…

That means alot, coming from you.