My mediocrity in local SkiMo events aside, which was mostly down to trying to race against guys who specialize in it all the time (versus the one I did in Colorado, where not adjusted to altitude I finished mid-pack), we reviewed the last two years of data together to come to the conclusion we did.
Tucson is only a day drive from here. Iām tempted but weāre only 5 weeks out from IMAZ, I am really hesitant about making any changes to my bike at this point.
The other factor is Iām counting on IMAZ to be my piece de resistance. From then on, I plan to just stick to sprints, maybe the occasional oly. I can put up with just about anything short of a spike for 13 miles.
I just pulled off a 6-hr training ride this weekend. It would have been impossible if I didnāt make some changes to my fit before hand. I was struggling a lot around the 100minute mark**. What worked for me is the combination of stretching out my position, lowering the saddle and reducing the saddle angle a couple degrees. Just lowering it wasnāt the trick and just tweaking the angle wasnāt working either. It was the added reach in my case with the other two adjustments that got me to 6 really quite comfortably. I was surprised.
Using one of these fancy V8 saddles in fact.
**and itās interesting as I noticed I was fine on the road and much better on the rollers. But the fixed trainer I really suffered until these changes.
And yet people continue to go through saddle after saddle looking for the perfect fit rather than just getting a bisaddle and having instant and infinite fit options. I donāt understand (other than marketing) why more people donāt buy one of these.
I do. It isnāt perfect but it necessarily drops the number of potential complaints of other saddles dramatically. My only complaint is I wish padding is a bit firmer. It just does what no other manufacturer can offer.
Blockquote[quote=āLurker4, post:45, topic:1281564ā]
It was the added reach in my case with the other two adjustments that got me to 6 really quite comfortably. I was surprised.
[/quote]
Iām not surprised. The number of people Iāve aero tested and fit that have commented with that has to be in the 100s over the last 8 years. It often sounds like : Holy F, xx mm more reach is so much more comfortable!
It might be 15mm or it might be 30-40mm more reach.
While currently the long majority of the shaped elbow pads/extensions have not been testing faster, imo due to their increased A, they do help facilitate some of the added reach people are clamoring for.
I canāt really speak to the durability of the product as mine has relatively little use. I too am fairly heavy (190-195). But even if durability becomes an issue, I would buy one of these every couple years over a non adjustable saddle every time. I tried too many tri saddles over the years trying to make them work for me. This saddle works for you. Iām really surprised other manufacturers havenāt decided something similar.
I could have sworn that Ramus was adjustable, but just looked closer and it is not. But, I have been following their development as I have worked on the development of my own saddle, and here is a shout out to them because the guy had worked so hard and constantly updated his design and materials, and from what I understand, it is a bomb proof and sturdy design with amazing foam that is replaceable, with a surprisingly comfortable shape:
Interesting design for sure. Also interesting claim that they are the first to develop replaceable seat pads. Iām not sure how old they are but Bisaddle has offered that for many years so that claim is likely false.
I believe what bisaddle offers is that the user can replace the two adjustable top pieces of the saddle, and the foam, saddle shell and cover material are all replaced during this process.
What Ramus is offering is the user can replace just the foam, on its own. The saddle shell remains, and there is no cover material. So, this is novel and new and I believe they are correct being the first to offer the ability for the user to replace just the foam with no need to dispose of a saddle shell or cover material.
We offer the ability for users to replace the foam and cover material, but the user has to mail their saddle in and the carbon shell/rails is not replaced (has a lifetime warranty).
I am doing 5-6 hr training rides and competing in 100m TT and 12 hours without an uncomfortable groin. I have even done a 24hr. Saddle comfort is not a problem, even when it poured it does for half the 24hr TT and I was soaked.
I got lucky that the TT bike I bought 6-7 years ago had an ISM PS2, that I immediately got on with. However upgraging the bike from the Boardman ATT to a Giant Trinity I find the saddle clamp is 20mm further back. So I am more restricted on getting saddle over BB. Saddle is still comfortable but I am after a better position.
I have been working on my flexibility and changing my position from pushing against the saddle to sitting on the nose with a more forward rotated pelvis. It is taking a while to get used to the new position. Yet to do longer that 90 mins on the turbo, but I think its partly a change of muscle use as much as anything else.
I am still searching for a saddle that is comfortable and has longer rails so I can be more forward, and rotated forward as well.
After trying so many damn saddles that always had one problem or another, I finally got a bisaddle.
I took about 90 minutes of ridding, fiddling but that ride and the hour I just did was the most comfortable Iāve been in a long time. Time will tell, but seems like we have a winner.
Interesting thing I realized is that my sit bones seem to be not symetrical. I noticed it when I did the cardboard measurement. Then after adjusting the seat for comfort, had to have the left arm of the nose out just a bit more than the right.
I will do some longer rides and see if things stay copasetic. The only complaint (if you want to call it that) is that the seat is noticably heavier than my ISM or Fizik