Lucy Charles-Barclay sticking with Taylor Knibb throughout the bike - I suggest that, alongside the ‘I will not be dropped’, Knibb was moderating her effort, mindful of her experience a month ago and wishing not to go close to overdoing it on the bike. But Knibb surely knew she would not prevail on the run so had to balance her bravery/ risk it/ will to win with her wish to finish/ prudence. We also saw the chasers make time from 60km onwards which also suggests that Knibb was not pushing it - contrast she sent it at 60km in Taupo, to earn the gap on Simmonds and Matthews and secure the win.
The final third this time was the second half of the long drag back up to the col (285m in 12km) - with Findlay pulling away from Learmonth, Matthews and Madsen; the fast descent (Knibb and LCB out on the bars cf chasers and apparently Findlay suffered from being a lightweight, comparatively “they dropped like a stone” she said (also confidence in the bars); and through Marbella and along the coast road. The chasers were 4:33 down and pulled it back to only 3:47 at T2: putting Matthews in catching distance.
LCB’s run was a controlled, measured, disciplined approach to the race - she set out steadily and with only a 3:20 lead on Matthews that was, as you say ‘measured’. By 4.5km Matthews had reduced the gap to 2:27 - nearly a minute caught with >10 miles to go. But then DNF. Knibb set off fast but she eased off. LCB ran a really even pace - no ‘afterburners’ were turned on, hence the catch. They were together going past me setting out along the breakwater but Knibb had dropped back by the time they returned from the end. And that was it. LCB ran 38:29 and 38:45. Wow!
Blummenfelt . . . trying to allow Stornes to bridge up. Was that a potential plan to have the two of them work to try to dispose of Geens? No (he said politely) - as others have opined. this is just ‘racing’. KB may have said this, but ‘sure’ - was just trying to avoid breaking the wind on that exposed stretch: the sea breeze had freshened. And both of them clearly slowed down: splits suggest to 3:22mpk compared to average 3:13. Coming past me on the breakwater Geens was running mid path allowing Blummenfelt to echelon: he should have been tight against the cones to minimise the drafting benefit. At one stage Stornes was over a minute down. As they looped round past transition for the last time, he closed to 25 seconds because of the two ahead faffing on the breakwater, but then KB pushed hard for the final mile and the gap went back out to a minute with Stornes well clear of Schomburg so ran it in. Blummenfelt ran 33:55 and 34:01; Geens 33:38 and 33:58 Stornes 34:16 and 34:12.
Speaking of Geens and Blummenfelt, they had a sprint finish for the ages brewing, trading blows entering the final kilometer. . . . . before seeing Geens in the finish chute with a gap over Blummenfelt. The exact type of high tension finish that we’re all seeking out of this type of racing and we all missed it. [Well I didn’t; was roadside with 350m to go just after Geens had made the overtake and cut to the right rail to be sure of the inside and then straight back up the the stand to see Geens sprint it in. :)) ]
After the WPro race I asked the finish line official, and another TO who was there where exactly was the finish line was and why wasn’t there a line on the carpet (I was in line looking seaward for both finishes). They didn’t know. We’ll all recall that after Sanders & vonBerg in Oceanside this was raised as ‘an issue’ and aiui Ironman had said ‘we’ll sort it’. There was no line (white) on the black carpet. Also the tape was being held (by Craig and ?Rinny for the women and two men in PH clown suits on Sunday) on the far side of the gantry. Wrong. On Sunday I saw no sign of an iPad or similar set up to offer the Head Ref evidence to determine who crossed the line first (in the event of a close one - Geens v KB anyone? We were deprived of the entertainment of a close finish in the women’s.
Section 2.05 RACE FINISH, TIMING, AND RESULTS (a) An athlete will be judged as finished the moment any part of their torso crosses a vertical line extending from the leading edge of the finish line gantry;
I’m not going to fault Lisa Perterer for pulling the ripcord on her season following her excellent performance in Kona. When you also factor that she was unlikely to be budged from her third-place position in the Pro Series - Not just “unlikely” - she could not overtake Loevseth and could not be displaced for #3. As for “pulling the ripcord” - have you heard she is not racing Dubai? And after that Qatar? She remains on the start list, whereas, unsurprisingly, Knibb and LCB have dropped off (start list only 16 strong). Six WPros who did complete are headed for Dubai, only 3 days away.
Having said that, and reflecting others’ comments ref networking etc, I chatted with Marta Sanchez who HAD travelled, albeit in country, outside the hotel. She would’ve been in the mix for that #3 spot if she’d been able to finish Kona (was injured and pulled out before dropping off the Queen K into the EL).