Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Wonder if this is going to impact Team USA uniforms that tri sports was supplying for ITU worlds races coming up?
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [guppie58] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I am guessing my USAT TriSports discount coupon isn't worth the paper it is printed on!!


Rich G.
Proud member of the Geritol wave!
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [RichG] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
RichG wrote:
I am guessing my USAT TriSports discount coupon isn't worth the paper it is printed on!!

Used it to get my Profile Design water bottle. Arrived yesterday. *phew*
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [gmatom] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I would think so. I ordered USAT Certified coaching gear, and it was months and months of excuses, with me never getting what I wanted. They seemed to blame TYR, but now it makes more sense why I could never get my order filled.....


gmatom wrote:
Wonder if this is going to impact Team USA uniforms that tri sports was supplying for ITU worlds races coming up?

Gary Geiger
http://www.geigerphoto.com Professional photographer

TEAM KiWAMi NORTH AMERICA http://www.kiwamitri.com, Rudy Project http://www.rudyprojectusa.com, GU https://guenergy.com/shop/ ; Salming World Ambassador; https://www.shopsalming.com
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [ericM40-44] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
sad day when anyone goes out of business.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 11 (moderator's edit) [ericj076] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Chapter 11 would most likely get them out of the lease in the Tempe store. Otherwise, they would probably be on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars in rent on an empty building. That could be the major factor in their decision to go this way. Vendors are not going to cut them off because they are a little slow paying, especially after millions of dollars worth of purchases. They are all hurting for business too. I suspect that after they get this behind them, they will come out stronger than ever.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [ggeiger] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ggeiger wrote:
I would think so. I ordered USAT Certified coaching gear, and it was months and months of excuses, with me never getting what I wanted. They seemed to blame TYR, but now it makes more sense why I could never get my order filled.....


gmatom wrote:
Wonder if this is going to impact Team USA uniforms that tri sports was supplying for ITU worlds races coming up?


Gary - you have now opened a whole new can of worms. You reply with facts....TriSports has had a few months of luxury waiting for the inevitable. Now, they will get the trial by internet - isnt it odd that ST did not break the story? You did not flame them on the forum...however, you did point out a contention. We wait...we wait for promises and what not...



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGRNHiMN9ZI
Last edited by: Jookie: Jun 19, 13 22:34
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [sentania] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Agreed, very well played!
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [ZackCapets] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
ZackCapets wrote:
tpero wrote:
Not surprised. I only ever tried ordering from trisports.com three times, but all three times the items were placed on back order, despite showing as "in stock" on the ordering page, and all three times, it took them a week to tell me it was on back-order, resulting in me canceling. It's hard to keep a positive cash flow operating that way.


Were you buying sale items? If so, then there were probably a ton of other people that wanted the same product you did and others' orders were fulfilled first. The item probably *was* in-stock, just not a million quantity at super-low price.

.

Unfortunately there are way too many online retailers that are horrible businesses. There are various sites that are notorious for having product in back order despite showing "in stock". It's false advertising and I view it as fraudulent.

These companies never have the product and most likely simply order/buy/try to get the product after you place your order. When they have trouble finding it (mind you they don't actually tell you all of this...you simply assume it already shipped)...nevertheless when they have trouble finding it, they may give you a call about it. Most likely, you have to call for them to say its on back order. Many of these shady online stores don't have the financial capital to keep much inventory. The basic premise in this whole saga is cash flow management - timing cash inflow with various cash outflows, all the while using short-term funds for personal compensation etc. Once time has run the course, the business declares bankruptcy yet the owners move on.

In my case, I cancelled my order immediately and went to an online store where I called one of the workers and had them physically walk to their warehouse to check to see if they had the product, which they did and said yes.

Never, ever, buy something on back order. Doesn't apply just to triathlon gear, but anything.

P.S. This trisports site charges excessive amounts for shipping. Never came close to placing an order with them since there is no reason.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [Cervelo Apple] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
This will take a little pressure off my inbox.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [guppie58] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
If you were a banker, doesn't sound as though you worked on distressed debt or workouts.

Bank can opt not to mature for any reason. I think you mean bank can opt to not to renew.

Blown covenants can trip default, however rarely do. Absolutely false, I can tell you blown covenants result in a minimum of a reservation of rights letter about 80-90% of the time. It rarely results in acceleration or litigation, but a covenant default is still a default and triggers action and often times an amendment only after the default has been noticed.

Contrary to public opinion, banks do not like seeing their clients in bankruptcy (or foreclosures). Again false, if the bank is fully secured they may prefer bankruptcy.

The rest I agree with to a large extent.




Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [guppie58] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
guppie58 wrote:
Kkennison wrote:
saltman wrote:
Fruitcake wrote:
mr. mike wrote:
Fruitcake wrote:
sorry, but as a banker I highly doubt the bank just up and called their line and equipment loans without warning. No judge in America would side with a bank on a "technical default" (ie non payment default) if the bank sues on a technical default. Something smells fishy here.


who says it was a "technical default"? Lines of credit have maturity dates. Typically one year at a time, maybe 2 for a really strong borrower. If you get to the maturity date and the bank won't extend, it's not a "technical default"; it's a payment default. As a banker's lawyer, I've seen plenty of borrowers file with for bankruptcy protection as the result of non-renewal of a line of credit. I'm not implying it was totally out of the blue, but if you can't get another lender to refinance because your financial condition is worse or the credit environment is changed (or usually both) and your existing lender won't extend, you are going to file.


I would go with that above, but read into the fact that they called their equipment loan too. These are 99.9% of the time closed ended terms loans. Given maybe they are cross collateralized with cross default language etc, who knows.


Reads like all of the above. LOC, probably blew covenants repeatedly and did not have a good handle on projections. LOC was not extended, cannot find a takeout bank, LOC matured and bank accelerated the equipment loan as well. Chapter 11, so it will be interesting to see if they can get a plan together acceptable to the court. They will need to find a DIP lender or equity in the near term or this will flip to a Chapter 7.


15 year seasoned corporate banker, thus seen situations like this multiple times. First, rarely does a company say they are late on their bills, thus the bank canceled their LOC, etc. Than bank always gets the first blame because it's easy. The business owner never sees the same level of risk the bank sees. The business owner also has a tendency to believe a bank is a partner in the business, which they are not.

LOC's mature anywhere from 1-3 years, depending on size. Bank can opt not to mature for any reason. Maybe they just don't want to lend to retail business. Don't matter. Blown covenants can trip default, however rarely do. Blown covenants usually result in additional monitoring and an increase in interest rate. Again, all relevant to size of the relationship. The smaller the relationship, the tougher the bank will be. What's small to one can be huge to another bank, so again relevant.

Contrary to public opinion, banks do not like seeing their clients in bankruptcy (or foreclosures). The collection rate drops significantly. With that said, I've pushed clients into bankruptcy because that was the only option left for whatever reason. Blaming the bank like Trisports is doing is just a smoke screen for the real problem.

It's always sad to see small businesses file. I've been in the banking world for 20 years covering a wide range of industries. Their letter was well crafted. It's never the borrower's fault and the bank is always made out to be the bad guy. After reading the letter and knowing about their expansion, it looks like they took on a little too much debt, second store failed, probably could not sublease it, first store was still underperforming, liquidty and free cash flow getting tight, bank getting nervous, borrower started to live off the line of credit to support other financial obligations (lease payments, term payments) and losses, both parties probably met on several occasions about the Claggett family stepping up on the personal side (no personal guaranty it looks like), them knowing it was too late to fix the cap structure, trends, lease agreements they said no way, blew a covenant or two, bank sent reservations of rights letter, asked them one more time about a capital call, they refused, froze line (which is usually the last straw), cash flow and liquidty not enough to support business, had some other local banks tell them no way on a refi, probably rode the payables a bit the last month to buy some time, then filed. This is a tough industry for DIP lending. Depending on how bad they rode the payables and treat vendors post-petitiion, it could be a long rode for them. They were lucky the bank did not have a personal guaranty. Most small businesses have to give one. Interesting to see they had enough personal liquidity to keep the company going post bankruptcy. Looks like the bank was the one taking the equity risk on their deal.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [RichG] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Got received mine with my renewal. Problem I've always found is that it's not such a deal to begin with since can't use any freeshipping & prices are higher to begin with. Works out to many be $2-3 on the minium $40 order.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [BarbBikeTechie] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Agreed. The bogus discount, in my opinion, reflects equally poorly on USAT.

~~ kate
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [Cervelo Apple] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Cervelo Apple wrote:
Unfortunately there are way too many online retailers that are horrible businesses. There are various sites that are notorious for having product in back order despite showing "in stock". It's false advertising and I view it as fraudulent.

These companies never have the product and most likely simply order/buy/try to get the product after you place your order. When they have trouble finding it (mind you they don't actually tell you all of this...you simply assume it already shipped)...nevertheless when they have trouble finding it, they may give you a call about it. Most likely, you have to call for them to say its on back order. Many of these shady online stores don't have the financial capital to keep much inventory. The basic premise in this whole saga is cash flow management - timing cash inflow with various cash outflows, all the while using short-term funds for personal compensation etc. Once time has run the course, the business declares bankruptcy yet the owners move on.

In my case, I cancelled my order immediately and went to an online store where I called one of the workers and had them physically walk to their warehouse to check to see if they had the product, which they did and said yes.

Never, ever, buy something on back order. Doesn't apply just to triathlon gear, but anything.

P.S. This trisports site charges excessive amounts for shipping. Never came close to placing an order with them since there is no reason.

I'm going to step in on this one. I own an internet retail business. We sell bodyboarding gear. We are experts in this field since both my wife and I were full time pro bodyboarders. There are SO MANY different products we sell that we would go bankrupt if we tried to stock every item we have on the site. HOWEVER...we don't have "in stock" or "out of stock" messages at all on our site. 90% of the products we carry, the ones that consistently sell well, we stock, but the other 10% are more specialized items that customers may want, but it's not cost-effective to stock if I only sell one every 2-3 months, so in most of those cases, we'll have a notice on the item that says something like, "We do not stock this item. Please allow 2-3 days for us to get it for you once you've ordered." Additionally, keeping a website with other 2,000 products constantly updated when, for example, a blue, size large t-shirt sells out is a full-time job in itself. Sometimes, we'll have one left of an item, and someone orders it at 2am when we're all sleeping, so that item isn't removed from the site until the next business day. If a second customer orders it before we've had the chance to remove it, we immediately contact that customer to let them know it's out of stock and give them options.

Now, in your defense, if they are displaying "in stock" messages and NOT contacting their customers immediately when something's missing, THAT is not good business in my opinion, but until you try to run a small internet business (my wife and I have 2 year 'round employees and 1 seasonal employee), don't knock it.

------------------
My business-eBodyboarding.com
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [TriBodyboarder] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
My experience with trisports is that on a (very) few occasions, they didn't have an item in stock even though it was listed as is, but I typically got an email within a couple of hours saying the item wasn't in stock...
Last edited by: Francois: Jun 20, 13 10:45
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [TriBodyboarder] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TriBodyboarder wrote:
Cervelo Apple wrote:

Additionally, keeping a website with other 2,000 products constantly updated when, for example, a blue, size large t-shirt sells out is a full-time job in itself. Sometimes, we'll have one left of an item, and someone orders it at 2am when we're all sleeping, so that item isn't removed from the site until the next business day. If a second customer orders it before we've had the chance to remove it, we immediately contact that customer to let them know it's out of stock and give them options.

quote]

Can't this be automated pretty easily with MS Access? That would save you one FTE.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [ProStatus] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
We use a system called Netsuite. I don't even know what "FTE" means. Netsuite is a cloud-based ecommerce system, and does have the capability to remove sold items, but it would take me several paragraphs to explain why we don't do that. Long story!

------------------
My business-eBodyboarding.com
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [gleveq] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gleveq wrote:
Wow.....this took awhile to get here. Curious as to why the "press release" was submitted to XTri and not ST. Or maybe it was....

I am saddened beyond belief, but not at all surprised.

G

First off: Hi Gail!

Second: Everyone needs to calm down. What was posted at Xtri wasn't a press release; it was the email that Seton sent to his vendors to appraise them of what was going on. It wasn't meant for public release. Sadly, Xtri decided to put it out there. Bummer.

I kindly received a call from Seton just a few days ago, just so I heard it from the horse's mouth on what really was going on and didn't get sucked into what happens here 100 percent of the time: inaccurate "sky is falling" conjecture.

What happened? Trisports received a loan to open the Tempe location, the bank decided after the opening to repeal the loan and Trisports had to file in order to close the Tempe location and reorganize the debt for that location. That's it. The Tucson store and online operations continue status quo.

I asked whether he wanted to do a release, but we both agreed it wasn't really worth creating a stir; they are not out of business, vendors are being paid, consumers are buying product out of their Tucson location, orders are being fulfilled. Seton said he's spoken directly to probably 2/3s of his vendors to let them know, and all of them are being looked after; nobody is being left out in the cold after this.

So long story short, Trisports are not going out of business; they simply had to shutter the Tempe location and reorganize the debt. All is status quo with their flagship Tucson location. Everyone will have to look elsewhere for their pre-race gear at Ironman Arizona this fall. That's about it. You can still shop online and shop in-store in Tucson. The worst is that a handful of Tempe location employees are out of a job. Seton said he offered jobs to some in Tucson, but being Phoenix people, some maybe ASU students, etc., they opted to stay.

As other have said, Seton and Debbie are as stand-up as they come. I've known them forever, and as a fellow Tucsonan I have a kinship. They're invested in this sport in a way few other retailers are. They're lifers, and have built an amazing reputation, both personally and professionally. That will continue.

So... everyone can cease running around in circles flapping their arms wildly. Sorry, had to step in and stop this rumor mill from spinning wildly out of control.

Jay Prasuhn
Marketing Specialist, American Bicycle Group (Quintana Roo//Litespeed//Obed)
twitter.com/jayprasuhn

Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [TriBodyboarder] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
TriBodyboarder wrote:
We use a system called Netsuite. I don't even know what "FTE" means. Netsuite is a cloud-based ecommerce system, and does have the capability to remove sold items, but it would take me several paragraphs to explain why we don't do that. Long story!

FTE=Full Time Equivalent(or 40 hrs/week). Just trying to save you some time :). Very nice website by the way.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [TriBodyboarder] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
FTE - Full Time Employee

I think the cost of a back end system to really reconcile online inventory vs in store inventory is quite pricey and really only worth it if a large part of your business is generated that way. Otherwise, a nice disclaimer at check-out that if an item turns out to be out of stock the buyer will be notified and the item put on back-order unless the buyer notifies the seller to cancel the order.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jen

"In order to keep a true perspective on one's importance, everyone should have a dog that worships him and a cat that will ignore him." - Dereke Bruce
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [STJay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
STJay wrote:
gleveq wrote:
Wow.....this took awhile to get here. Curious as to why the "press release" was submitted to XTri and not ST. Or maybe it was....

I am saddened beyond belief, but not at all surprised.

G


First off: Hi Gail!

Second: Everyone needs to calm down. What was posted at Xtri wasn't a press release; it was the email that Seton sent to his vendors to appraise them of what was going on. It wasn't meant for public release. Sadly, Xtri decided to put it out there. Bummer.

I kindly received a call from Seton just a few days ago, just so I heard it from the horse's mouth on what really was going on and didn't get sucked into what happens here 100 percent of the time: inaccurate "sky is falling" conjecture.

What happened? Trisports received a loan to open the Tempe location, the bank decided after the opening to repeal the loan and Trisports had to file in order to close the Tempe location and reorganize the debt for that location. That's it. The Tucson store and online operations continue status quo.

I asked whether he wanted to do a release, but we both agreed it wasn't really worth creating a stir; they are not out of business, vendors are being paid, consumers are buying product out of their Tucson location, orders are being fulfilled. Seton said he's spoken directly to probably 2/3s of his vendors to let them know, and all of them are being looked after; nobody is being left out in the cold after this.

So long story short, Trisports are not going out of business; they simply had to shutter the Tempe location and reorganize the debt. All is status quo with their flagship Tucson location. Everyone will have to look elsewhere for their pre-race gear at Ironman Arizona this fall. That's about it. You can still shop online and shop in-store in Tucson. The worst is that a handful of Tempe location employees are out of a job. Seton said he offered jobs to some in Tucson, but being Phoenix people, some maybe ASU students, etc., they opted to stay.

As other have said, Seton and Debbie are as stand-up as they come. I've known them forever, and as a fellow Tucsonan I have a kinship. They're invested in this sport in a way few other retailers are. They're lifers, and have built an amazing reputation, both personally and professionally. That will continue.

So... everyone can cease running around in circles flapping their arms wildly. Sorry, had to step in and stop this rumor mill from spinning wildly out of control.

Banks don't just decide to repeal a loan. A loan is a binding contract. The only way to 'repeal' a loan is for clauses within the contract to be broken. When that happens, it's not a 'repealed' loan it's a 'called' loan. Big difference. How you worded it implies that it was the banks fault. It's easy, and typical, to blame the bank because it's a faceless corporation. But there is more to the story than the bank just 'repealing' the loan.

_________________________________
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [STJay] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
1) That's a nice story but not how banks operate.

2) Bad things happen to good people too, nobody on here has questioned the character of the owners.

3) Chapter 11 allows them to continue to operate, but they have to file a plan that will satisfy the debt holders, period. They can't just file and ignore the debt problem and go on living happily ever after.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [saltman] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
saltman wrote:
1) That's a nice story but not how banks operate.

2) Bad things happen to good people too, nobody on here has questioned the character of the owners.

3) Chapter 11 allows them to continue to operate, but they have to file a plan that will satisfy the debt holders, period. They can't just file and ignore the debt problem and go on living happily ever after.

In today's environment, people like to blame banks when things go wrong, especially after this past recession. People blamed the banks for collapsing the economy, yet they don't see any fault in the homeowners who purchased a house based on loan structure instead of cash flow. Homeowners share just as much blame as the investment banks.

_________________________________
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.
Quote Reply
Re: trisports filing for chapter 13 [gleveq] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
gleveq wrote:
Wow.....this took awhile to get here. Curious as to why the "press release" was submitted to XTri and not ST. Or maybe it was....

I am saddened beyond belief, but not at all surprised.

G


Well, we don't run press releases on slowtwitch, nor do we copy and paste articles from other sites. :-)
Quote Reply

Prev Next