Slowman wrote:
Economist wrote:
Slowman wrote:
Economist wrote:
Ai_1 wrote:
Economist wrote:
I honestly don't understand why people by Enve products. They are grossly over priced, which I know doesn't stop people......
I think you'll find that in some circles that's the entire point.....which is pathetic
Not an exact analogy, but it reminds me of the scene in American Psycho where they're comparing their business cards.
I could understand if it were a luxury good but I don't see Enve as a luxury good.
With Assos, another extreme, you can point to countless industry reviews and customer reviews that rave about comfort and durability. There is something tangible. But damn you pay for it. With Enve, I've never heard anything about them. No raving industry reviews other than 'looks'. No raving customer reviews. They don't really have a reputation. They are just there.
But whatever. We all have our goofy preferences.
just because you haven't heard of this brand's reputation doesn't mean it doesn't have one. it just means you haven't heard of it. we wrote about this new project the day before this thread was started, and in there we linked to a few articles we've written on the factory and the brand. it's a premium brand held in high regard, and it has a tradition of building frame sub-assemblies, so, this bike is not a stretch.
i have a problem with this bike, but the problem is not with the brand or the price or the construction or any of that. these guys have well-earned the right to be taken seriously as a bike maker, every bit as much or more than parlee or allied or guru before it or anyone who's done what it is they do. my problem is that i don't like one-piece bar/stem combos.
but if you look at what you're getting here, full custom, for a price starting at under $10,000 (and it's a good spec for that price), show me who's making that bike for less money? who's making full custom, including handlebars, carbon bikes, electronic shifting, for under $10,000? maybe you just think $10,000 for any road bike is too much and, okay. but for what they're making, i think that's a pretty good price.
this weekend i rolled up to an establishment called "the old place" in the middle of the santa monica mountains, and it's full of LA cyclists halfway thru their rides, and i was on a brand new, first ride, QR SRsix, i just finished hanging the parts the day before, SRAM force AXS etap, and out of probably 40 bikes i think i could count on one hand the bikes that costs less than mine. i was aboard the ford pinto. so, it might not be your idea of a worthy spend, nor mine, but in my opinion they do have a stellar reputation, and there is a market for that bike.
Well my post focused on the wheel sets from Enve You say they are a premium brand...but the research doesn't really show anything other than appearance and build quality. The majority of industry reviews did mention they are priced above competing lines. I don't recall any mention as a premium brand. Even their "about us" page on the website is only one paragraph that says really nothing about them.
To me, Enve brand is no different than Zipp, Reynolds, etc.
well, i'll grant you that. i don't think enve is better than zipp. i would say tho that i think its above reynolds, mostly because i think enve is more of an innovator. i guess i hold zipp in higher regard than do you. i guess i wonder what you think is a true premium wheel brand if zipp and enve aren't.
beyond that, it seems to me that hed and enve are the only 2 brands that can actually make a bike from the wheels up to the handlebars, frame included. enve is probably the most complete carbon bike factory in the world, if you consider all the bike parts it makes, and what it can build if asked. what this new bike
isn't is a monocoque, so, it depends what it is you value. also, i think it's fair to question the need for a full custom these days for a variety of reasons we could discuss.
I am the a-typical consumer. I needed new XC and gravel wheels. I do not follow industry news on where wheels are at, so I need to use Google to find industry reviews and need to use forums to get recommendations. When I was researching my wheels I was looking for performance first budget second. I am a researcher by trade, so yes spreadsheets were involved.
I didn't really rank wheels on brand, but instead on performance. Zipp, Hed and Reynolds showed up in the top consistently (industry reviews). I hold Zipp in high regard because it appears they are always innovating. They also came highly recommended in forums.
I would group Zipp, Hed and Reynolds together. Not sure if I would call them premium brands, maybe market leaders. I guess it could be argued market leaders are premium brands.
Then next batch of manufacturers are the independents. Hunt, Light Bicycle, Flo, and some others I forgot. Hunt and LB showed up a lot in reviews and forums.
Then there are the manufacturers that would show up in random industry reviews or forum recommendations. We can all them the"one offs": Roval, Mavic, Enve, etc.
Finally, the brands that really showed up nowhere in my research: Boyd, Lightweight, Mercury, BTLOS, etc.
I used the phrase 'grossly overpriced' because of who I was comparing Enve too. I am looking at MC vs MB. It was way out of whack compared to the others. Maybe if I made more of an effort to figure out why they cost so much I could boost their MB. But I'm the consumer. Zipp, Reynolds, Hed, Flo,etc. they GIVE you that information. It's in your face: performance performance performance. Enve provided none of that and given the price, it was easy to set them on the side and focus on other brands. Enve did a poor job selling their product to me. Maybe they are geared toward the rider that is more plugged into the industry. I may do over 15 races a season, but I don't stay plugged into all the latest and greatest. I plug in when I need something.
If I were looking for aero wheels, maybe things would be different. That's a more hands on purchase. I didn't care about aero in my last two purchases.
_________________________________
The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design.