I know you guys read what you want to read and not what is written, but let me clarify.
The three of you have made comments about other nationalities, that at best were simply offensive and worse Xenophobic and bigoted.
You have also made comments about me without knowing me, where I am from, what I do for a living, my background or my education, or for that matter the color of my skin or my religion. I think the only comments I would be guilty of making would be pointing out that none of you have actually read my posts and that you have made the xenophobic comments which is true and several other people have pointed this out as well.
I have not advocated Frances action I have just pointed out repeatedly that they are a democracy, and more so than this country in the sense that 70-80% of the registered voters actually particpate in the electoral procecess, and that if they dont want to go to war that is their right and freedom in a democracy.
You fella's simply cant seem to get past this, you just dont get it, they are simply doing at a greater level (70-80% of the population voting as opposed to 35% here, half of which are extreme left and the other half extreme right) what this country was created as, a democracy, and when they disagree with you, you slam them for it. The irony is hysterical.
It is also the Germans right, the Russians and the British. 70%+ of the population in these countries are anti this action, you cant argue with the numbers, they are a fact and people do not support this abroad.Are they all pro terrorism because they dont support bombing Baghdad back to the stoneage? I dont think so but I am sure you fellas will tell me all these anti war people are pro terrorism.
I have also stated that I disagree with it, consider it a waste of time and resources when he's contained, but war heads are literally getting "lost" in Russia and NK has weapons that will reach SD.
This is a free country and I have the god given right to disagree with Bush and Clinton and Daschle and Cheney (is he even still alive?) and Rumsfeld and Gore (who is as much of a clown as Bush).
I also have the right to express my disagreement. Disagreeing with the action taken does not make me pro SH or pro Al Queda, it just means I think that there are other proven and documented ways of containing the situation and that these should have been pursued.
That said as I posted to start with, I hope there are a minimum of casualties on all sides and that this is over quickly but dont mischaracterise my position or make assumptions about me.
Andrew
The three of you have made comments about other nationalities, that at best were simply offensive and worse Xenophobic and bigoted.
You have also made comments about me without knowing me, where I am from, what I do for a living, my background or my education, or for that matter the color of my skin or my religion. I think the only comments I would be guilty of making would be pointing out that none of you have actually read my posts and that you have made the xenophobic comments which is true and several other people have pointed this out as well.
I have not advocated Frances action I have just pointed out repeatedly that they are a democracy, and more so than this country in the sense that 70-80% of the registered voters actually particpate in the electoral procecess, and that if they dont want to go to war that is their right and freedom in a democracy.
You fella's simply cant seem to get past this, you just dont get it, they are simply doing at a greater level (70-80% of the population voting as opposed to 35% here, half of which are extreme left and the other half extreme right) what this country was created as, a democracy, and when they disagree with you, you slam them for it. The irony is hysterical.
It is also the Germans right, the Russians and the British. 70%+ of the population in these countries are anti this action, you cant argue with the numbers, they are a fact and people do not support this abroad.Are they all pro terrorism because they dont support bombing Baghdad back to the stoneage? I dont think so but I am sure you fellas will tell me all these anti war people are pro terrorism.
I have also stated that I disagree with it, consider it a waste of time and resources when he's contained, but war heads are literally getting "lost" in Russia and NK has weapons that will reach SD.
This is a free country and I have the god given right to disagree with Bush and Clinton and Daschle and Cheney (is he even still alive?) and Rumsfeld and Gore (who is as much of a clown as Bush).
I also have the right to express my disagreement. Disagreeing with the action taken does not make me pro SH or pro Al Queda, it just means I think that there are other proven and documented ways of containing the situation and that these should have been pursued.
That said as I posted to start with, I hope there are a minimum of casualties on all sides and that this is over quickly but dont mischaracterise my position or make assumptions about me.
Andrew