PJH wrote:
I may get shot down for this one but I'll just be honest....
I'm considering signing up to Zwift as the races seem to be a good way to do some high intensity training as an alternative to completing outside (difficult to hit the intensity) or completing indoors whilst watching a movie (not massively inspiring).I know the races are just for fun / a training tool and shouldn't be taken too seriously. Nevertheless, I'm a bit (possibly irrationally) put off by some of what I've seen and read regarding being disadvantaged as a bigger / heavier / more muscular cyclist.
In some of the data I've seen people seem to be finishing races at identical times on relatively flat courses with > 100W difference in average power. I realise use of drafting / powerups and many other factors is clearly going to impact average watts in my example. I also realise the dramatic effect of weight on climbing and I know Zwift has a algorithm for factoring in both this and assumed CdA based on weight. Nevertheless I've ended up with this perception that Zwift unfairly penalises those who are bigger / heavier / more muscular by focusing on W/KG even on flat courses.
So my question is what are people's view on the accuracy of the Zwift algorithm please? I.E on a flat course will a 90KG cyclist with a FTP of 400W ride away from a 45KG cyclist with a FTP of 200W (assuming there both flat out) as if they are standing still as they would do so in real life despite the fact they are both at 4.4W/KG?
in my opinion/experience whatever you are as a climber relative to a roleur on the road will be pretty well replicated in-game. this could determine how you choose your races. what i would so, tho, is if you like to just get the stuffing kicked out of you from time to time, in a fun way, then look at rides, not races. here's the thing about rides. is there a finish line? either by distance or by time? if there's a finish line, it's a race. so...
if you look at an event that has ride leaders (see the
profile of this guy, just up this morning), and these are good leaders, who work to keep the group together, it's really a better workout in my opinion. because the point is not to drop you, it's to keep you from getting dropped. if you don't get dropped you'll continue to ride at a high level for a longer time period. it'll also give you a sense of where you do well or poorly relative to other riders as the terrain changes.
Dan Empfield
aka Slowman