Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Wheel manufacturers advertised weights
Quote | Reply
I was interested in a comment in a recent thread "Why not buy one of those very pricey Falcon Accel II wheels? Aren't all the track racers using them? They may not be the most rugged, but you could climb the Zermatt on one they are so light 700 grams"

You have to be careful of manufacturers advertised weights the Falcon Acell II mass does not include hubs. I have been doing a bit of research into wheel weights and I have found it depends upon who you ask as to how much they weigh. I have made up a table of wheel weights which are I believe representative of true mass (give or take for hub variations).

Rear Disc Tubular Wheels 650c/700c (add approx 100g for clinchers)

Falcon Acell II 750/920
Zipp 840 & 900 875/960
Lightweight 910/1000
Corima CN 940/1020
Suguno 975/1075
Campy Ghibli N/A/1100
X-Treme 1000/1100
XLab 1070/1185
HED Superlight 1100/1220
Renn 1100/1195
FIR 1200/1300
HED Kona 1200/1300
Mavic Comet 1300/1400

Front Aero Tubular Wheels 650c/700c (add approx 100g for clinchers)


Lightweight aero 440/585
Xlab aero 500/565
Zipp 440 515/570
HED Alps 575/650
Corima Aero 590/630
X-Treme 640/740
Nimble 3 665/710
Giant Aero 700/800
XLab 4 710/795
HED 3D 720/790
Corima 4 735/775
FIR 4 735/775
HED Jet 60 760/800
XLab 3 760/800

HED Deep 90 790/1020
Campagnola Shamal 800/950
FIR 3 800/90
CAT 3 850/N/A

Spinergy 4 850/1020
Specialized 3 1050/1200
Aerospoke 4 1470/1570

If anybody disagrees with the weights posted i.e. you have the wheel and you have weighed it, please let me know so I can update my list.

On a personal note I would dont think there is an ideal wheel manufacturer above, ideally I would want an Hed shaped (elliptical) light weight dimpled (Zipp) rear disc with Corima hubs and a nimble type but 4 spoke (large surface area) front wheel both capable of taking clincher or tubular tires and all from the same manufacturer!


Cheers AndyA

Quote Reply
Re: Wheel manufacturers advertised weights [AndyA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Thanks for the list. Quite helpful.

My front/rear combo comes in at 1765 grams.

Compared to the lightest combo I would ever consider (Zipp 909, I actually wouldn't consider it because of price, but anyway): 1540 grams.

I can live with that extra 1 pound (wheel difference: slightly more than 1/2 pound. All those dollars, more than $1000, still in my pocket brings me to 1 pound). :)


----------------------------------
Justin in Austin, get it? :)

Cool races:
- Redman
- Desoto American Triple T
Quote Reply
Re: Wheel manufacturers advertised weights [Justin on LI] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
Justin

It gets quite interesting when you bnegin to quote wheel combinations as my short list above gives you 11424 different wheel sets. Decisions decisions, decisions....

Math: 136 possible rear wheels x 84 possible front wheels = 11424 (13 rear wheels in 4 types (650/700/clincher/tub) = 52 + 21 aero rear wheels in 4 types = 84 x 21 aero front wheel sets in 4 types)


AndyA
Last edited by: AndyA: Mar 28, 03 8:46
Quote Reply
Re: Wheel manufacturers advertised weights [AndyA] [ In reply to ]
Quote | Reply
I would think that the problem here is not mathematical, but logical. Most people with 700c wheeled frames don't consider using 650c wheels, as the look of a nice racing machine with brake calipers outfitted with drop-bolts is plain ridiculous. Similarly, very few people (I would hope!) ever tried to cram a 700c wheel in a frame that's designed to run 650c ...

I'd go for 3 types, at most, myself.

Dre'
Quote Reply