A friend of mine wants a tri bike and is excited about getting a tri specific set up. He rides alone a couple times a week on a turn- of-the-century Cannondale road bike and has done a few sprints. He wants to move to Olympic distance.
He is not familar with bikes or bike fitting, so asked me for some guidance. We live in different cities, so knowing the Slowtwitch "rules", I suggested he see a FIST certified fitter located in his area to get fit coordinates prior to deciding on a bike. The fellow I suggested seems experienced, and was recommended to him by a bike shop as well.
He met with the guy, told him he wanted a aero position fit, but when I talked to him afterwards, he was disappointed. When he looked up the bikes that were suggested, they were all standard road bikes. I had him send me the zinn sheet, and he was given a road bike fit. He did not touch or see a pair of aerobars during his session.
He emailed the fitter, asking if there were suggestions for a tri bike, which of course there is not. This is part of the fitters response:
"These number will not work for a Tri Bike, that is a completely different session that will take another 1.5 hours. I really believe that you will be super happy with what we discovered. At this time for you I think it is the best decision to go with a road bike that can double as a Tri bike with some clip on bars."
He isn't hapoy. He wants a tri bike.
So the question is, what is the fitters responsibility? I feel that he should have given his client what he was looking for, not decided what he felt his client should have. If he didn't think he could get him happy in aero, then tell him, but start with that objective.
Also, if the fitter doesn't think he will be comfortable in an aero position, how is he going to be comfortable in clip-ons in a road bike position.?
Am I off base?
He is not familar with bikes or bike fitting, so asked me for some guidance. We live in different cities, so knowing the Slowtwitch "rules", I suggested he see a FIST certified fitter located in his area to get fit coordinates prior to deciding on a bike. The fellow I suggested seems experienced, and was recommended to him by a bike shop as well.
He met with the guy, told him he wanted a aero position fit, but when I talked to him afterwards, he was disappointed. When he looked up the bikes that were suggested, they were all standard road bikes. I had him send me the zinn sheet, and he was given a road bike fit. He did not touch or see a pair of aerobars during his session.
He emailed the fitter, asking if there were suggestions for a tri bike, which of course there is not. This is part of the fitters response:
"These number will not work for a Tri Bike, that is a completely different session that will take another 1.5 hours. I really believe that you will be super happy with what we discovered. At this time for you I think it is the best decision to go with a road bike that can double as a Tri bike with some clip on bars."
He isn't hapoy. He wants a tri bike.
So the question is, what is the fitters responsibility? I feel that he should have given his client what he was looking for, not decided what he felt his client should have. If he didn't think he could get him happy in aero, then tell him, but start with that objective.
Also, if the fitter doesn't think he will be comfortable in an aero position, how is he going to be comfortable in clip-ons in a road bike position.?
Am I off base?