Login required to started new threads

Login required to post replies

Prev Next
Re: USADA/Lance Armstrong File Official Thread [chemsmith] [ In reply to ]
 
And you're not allowed to respond unless you do your homework, young man!
 
Re: A Question Only [Power13] [ In reply to ]
 
Power13 wrote:
shootthegap wrote:
Here is the article: http://www.cyclingnews.com/...p-armstrong-positive


Hearsay....Kathy Lemond has no direct knowledge of the alleged pay-off. She is only repeating what she was told by someone about the incident, and that person disputes her claim.

Not saying it didn't happen, but there is simply no meat to this particular claim.

I agree, but I think it would be something for the UCI (laugh, laugh) to look into. If it happened like they said a simple bank statement from then would say yes or no.

- Cat 2
- Training Peaks ambassador

"A good coach will do more for you than a good set of wheels."
 
Re: A Question Only [Kay Serrar] [ In reply to ]
 
Do you know why the DOJ dropped their case?

I don't think it's been reported, but just checking.
 
Re: A Question Only [ In reply to ]
 
Levi gets dropped from OPQS

Suffer Well.
 
Re: A Question Only [bobloblaw] [ In reply to ]
 
bobloblaw wrote:
You're totally ignoring Lance's role as a ringleader of organized doping and key enforcer of the omerta.

Yea of his team. There was plenty of other teams with organized doping. There was doping way before Lance and there still is doping. Several get caught every year.
 
Re: A Question Only [TriBeer] [ In reply to ]
 
TriBeer wrote:
Do you know why the DOJ dropped their case?

I don't think it's been reported, but just checking.

No idea. This seems to sum up the current state of play in terms of what is known.

http://velonews.competitor.com/...e-was-dropped_260724

It can be speculated that:
- The Fed investigation was instrumental in getting athletes to come clean (threat of perjury and jail time). This may have then helped convince them to speak openly to USADA.
- The Feds may have been having trouble directly linking USPS sponsorship funds to PED purchases and/or other CRIMINAL behaviour (note, they didn't care about PED use within cycling, per se)
- Or not... The Fed investigation seemed to be picking up steam, according to some sources, and Novitsky was apparently very upset when it was shelved
- Which, if so, means it may have been a purely political decision. LA clearly has friends in high places, as we saw with the anti-USADA letters from senior politicians over the summer.
- The timing of the investigation being dropped was also suspicious. Just ahead of the Superbowl (get it buried) and just after a DA's appointment (I think, but cant recall which DA).
- Some say it was because it was an election year and the Feds had just lost the Bonds perjury case and the Clemens case was a mistrial. So it would have looked bad for Obama possibly.

But whatever the truth, it seems we may not have heard the end of it. Either when more details are released under the Freedom of Information Act or if they re-open the investigation.
 
Re: A Question Only [jmh] [ In reply to ]
 
jmh wrote:
Levi gets dropped from OPQS

Not really too upset by this. I'm sure he's not surprised either.



Heath Dotson
HD Coaching:Website |Twitter: 140 Characters or Less|Facebook:Follow us on Facebook
 
Re: A Question Only [Kay Serrar] [ In reply to ]
 
Thank you for the info.
 
Re: A Question Only [Kay Serrar] [ In reply to ]
 
[... The Fed investigation seemed to be picking up steam, according to some sources, and Novitsky was apparently very upset when it was shelved
- Which, if so, means it may have been a purely political decision. LA clearly has friends in high places, as we saw with the anti-USADA letters from senior politicians over the summer.
- The timing of the investigation being dropped was also suspicious. Just ahead of the Superbowl (get it buried) and just after a DA's appointment (I think, but cant recall which DA).
- Some say it was because it was an election year and the Feds had just lost the Bonds perjury case and the Clemens case was a mistrial. So it would have looked bad for Obama possibly. ]

I would say this part of your post is the reason the case got dropped.


I agree with Betsy A., this entire thing is the biggest fraud in the history of sports. Think about the magnitude of what was parlayed from the heroic story of LA overcoming cancer to win 7 Tours. Interesting how he later tells fellow riders that he can't do HGH anymore because it's a cancer risk. Hmmm...wonder if that's how he got cancer to begin with? You couldn't make up a better movie script - "Athlete takes drugs, drugs lead to cancer, athlete beats cancer and comes back and takes more drugs to become heroic figure in sport, makes $100s of millions of dollars, starts anti-cancer foundation based on his fame."
 
Re: USADA/Lance Armstrong File Official Thread [Maui5150] [ In reply to ]
 
Meh...I don't recall Fred drooling on his self all that much towards the end, but i do agree, he did stumble over some names...I used to love the real hate that developed between Dave Shea and Derek Sanderson though...


"one eye doubles my eyesight, so things don't look half bad" John Hiatt
 
Re: A Question Only [TriBeer] [ In reply to ]
 
Except that LA was not the only one who had a case filed against him. You missed that part!
 
Re: A Question Only [LoriT] [ In reply to ]
 
http://www.cyclingnews.com/...p-armstrong-positive

500K from Nike....if this is true, I think this is indicative of the widespread fraud & I'd like to see the DOJ pick things back up. (if it's true)
 
Re: A Question Only [bobloblaw] [ In reply to ]
 
bobloblaw wrote:
You're totally ignoring Lance's role as a ringleader of organized doping and key enforcer of the omerta.

All the testimonies I read sounded to me like most of the others were already doping or involved in their own doping plans prior to catching up with Lance. Once they met Lance they asked him for assistance or some EPO and he obliged to THEIR request.

This all seems ass backwards to me. Yea, Lance doped, but it appears to me that everyone went to him to help with their own personal doping.
Maybe I missed it as I didn't read all of the report, but can anyone enlighten me as to which riders Lance took from a clean rider and turned them into a doper??
I don't see Lance as any sort of "Doping Ring Leader" other than everyone that was already doping looked to Lance for his guidance. This only make him their self appointed ring leader.

Again - I didn't read the entire report so I could be way off base here.
Michael
 
Re: A Question Only [LoriT] [ In reply to ]
 
Wrong! I acknowledged them.
 
Re: A Question Only [MKirk] [ In reply to ]
 
"All the testimonies I read sounded to me like most of the others were already doping or involved in their own doping plans prior to catching up with Lance. Once they met Lance they asked him for assistance or some EPO and he obliged to THEIR request." (MKirk)

I got the same impression from the Reasoned Decision report.

Now, they can blame LA for their doping and use him as a scapegoat.
 
Re: A Question Only [Kay Serrar] [ In reply to ]
 
Kay Serrar wrote:
TriBeer wrote:
Do you know why the DOJ dropped their case?

I don't think it's been reported, but just checking.


No idea. This seems to sum up the current state of play in terms of what is known.

http://velonews.competitor.com/...e-was-dropped_260724

It can be speculated that:
- The Fed investigation was instrumental in getting athletes to come clean (threat of perjury and jail time). This may have then helped convince them to speak openly to USADA.
- The Feds may have been having trouble directly linking USPS sponsorship funds to PED purchases and/or other CRIMINAL behaviour (note, they didn't care about PED use within cycling, per se)
- Or not... The Fed investigation seemed to be picking up steam, according to some sources, and Novitsky was apparently very upset when it was shelved
- Which, if so, means it may have been a purely political decision. LA clearly has friends in high places, as we saw with the anti-USADA letters from senior politicians over the summer.
- The timing of the investigation being dropped was also suspicious. Just ahead of the Superbowl (get it buried) and just after a DA's appointment (I think, but cant recall which DA).
- Some say it was because it was an election year and the Feds had just lost the Bonds perjury case and the Clemens case was a mistrial. So it would have looked bad for Obama possibly.

But whatever the truth, it seems we may not have heard the end of it. Either when more details are released under the Freedom of Information Act or if they re-open the investigation.

Ok, that at least confirms how USADA was able to entice the testimonies from GH, etc. I seem to remember some people saying that the Fed's had little to do with this part of the investigation
 
Re: A Question Only [TxDude] [ In reply to ]
 
The biggest fraud in the history of sports? C'mon now, I love cycling...but it's still just bike racing. In the grand scheme of things it's very much a two-bit sport.

You've heard of the Black Sox scandal right? And the fact that the NE Patriots illegally videotaped other teams practices and won 3 Super Bowls? Not to mention drugs in baseball, football, etc. Hell, many people think the greatest basketball player of all time was suspended from the NBA for betting on games and that it was all covered up by the commissioner so he had to go play baseball for a year.

Lance is a charismatic dude with some powerful friends, but he's just a bike racer.



Portside Athletics Blog
 
Re: A Question Only [LoriT] [ In reply to ]
 
LOL! Like all of the claims, this one is based on rank heresay, speculation, and sloppy supposition. Most Americans don't know a fact from a wild guess..... So sad.

Now they want to drag Nike into this stupidity? Sheesh....

The haters are a sorry, underemployed lot.

If you believe this, I have a gay Kenyan Socialist you can vote for.

-Robert

"How wonderful it is that nobody need wait a single moment before starting to improve the world." ~Anne Frank
 
Re: A Question Only [TxDude] [ In reply to ]
 
Yeah, when you realize that Lance calls two ex-presidents friends, it's safe to say politics may have been involved.



Portside Athletics Blog
 
Re: A Question Only [Devlin] [ In reply to ]
 
Devlin wrote:
triathlonshots wrote:
FJB wrote:
I could name some other non-American sports and certain countries which had or still have problems with drugs in sports.


Yeah but could you name a single sport or country free of drugs in sports?


that is a tough one, lets say Pitcairn island id PED free? But really I think some sports don't lend themselves so well to PEDs. Like say golf which requires a lot of technique, a calming drug may help but i doubt it and it is a bigger money making sport than cycling. To me cycling is very prone to PED use, because the benefit is always going to show in results. PED use in say olympic triathlon is less usefull than say ironman distance I would say.
Some countries have histories of very high PED use like the eastern block countries before the wall come down. But there are others also.
I am dissapointed in the extent of the now proven allegations against LA but I don't see him as a reflection of USA sports people. He is a reflection of professional cycling and as the top benefactor of it, the public, sponsors, fans, cyclists etc need to know the truth.

G.


I posted this earlier somewhere, but golfers have experimented with PED's. There have been rumors (And rumors only) that a few of the more built golfers have used steroids, and in the book "A Good Walk Spoiled", they talked with a golfer (I forget which one, one of the top golfers around 1993ish) that said he had experimented with beta blockers to keep HR controlled, but then he couldn't get that good surge when he needed it.

Daly (Not that anyone really pays attention to him) had a big stink when he was suspended accusing tour players of all kinds of PED's and was going to be a whistleblower but nobody really paid attention.

John


Yeah, a sport (golf) where you can literally make almost a billion dollars over your career doesn't have PEDs. As if steroids or testosterone that builds muscle without having to do weightlifting movements that would disrupt your stroke wouldn't be used.

The same stupid argument was made about batting and baseball. I remember Stuart Scott floating out that whopper with his lazy eye on television and trying to get the public to buy it.
 
Re: A Question Only [Mad Jee] [ In reply to ]
 
Those are scandalous and those sports have bigger budgets/payrolls, sure, but they still all seem like more straightforward cases of guys doing something wrong in relative isolation compared to this narrative arc, where the drug cheating is such an ironic part of the very fabric of the story itself as it involves the larger charity beyond, and not just a matter of gaining a competitive edge within the sporting context:

You couldn't make up a better movie script - "Athlete takes drugs, drugs lead to cancer, athlete beats cancer and comes back and takes more drugs to become heroic figure in sport, makes $100s of millions of dollars, starts anti-cancer foundation based on his fame."
 
Re: A Question Only [TriBeer] [ In reply to ]
 
TriBeer wrote:
"
All the testimonies I read sounded to me like most of the others were already doping or involved in their own doping plans prior to catching up with Lance. Once they met Lance they asked him for assistance or some EPO and he obliged to THEIR request." (MKirk)

I got the same impression from the Reasoned Decision report.

Now, they can blame LA for their doping and use him as a scapegoat.


Seriously? Read the rider affidavits. Some of them did not dope until they got to US Postal.
 
Re: A Question Only [Runguy] [ In reply to ]
 
Runguy wrote:
I seem to remember some people saying that the Fed's had little to do with this part of the investigation


That is because Travis Tygart stated that:


Quote:
The American continued by explaining that USADA did not receive any information from the federal investigation into Armstrong's former team, US Postal, even though this had initially been planned. The fraud investigation was filed last February.


http://www.cyclingnews.com/...strong-investigation
Last edited by: tranzformer: Oct 16, 12 11:12
 
Re: A Question Only [Mad Jee] [ In reply to ]
 
Mad Jee wrote:
The biggest fraud in the history of sports? C'mon now, I love cycling...but it's still just bike racing. In the grand scheme of things it's very much a two-bit sport.

You've heard of the Black Sox scandal right? And the fact that the NE Patriots illegally videotaped other teams practices and won 3 Super Bowls? Not to mention drugs in baseball, football, etc. Hell, many people think the greatest basketball player of all time was suspended from the NBA for betting on games and that it was all covered up by the commissioner so he had to go play baseball for a year.

Lance is a charismatic dude with some powerful friends, but he's just a bike racer.

This goes way beyond bike racing. But I agree there are other big frauds. Still say this one is right at the top. This involves cheaters, team sponsored cheating, federation cover ups, bribes, and maybe even political cover up (DOJ case being dropped suddenly).
 
Re: A Question Only [MKirk] [ In reply to ]
 
MKirk wrote:
bobloblaw wrote:
You're totally ignoring Lance's role as a ringleader of organized doping and key enforcer of the omerta.


All the testimonies I read sounded to me like most of the others were already doping or involved in their own doping plans prior to catching up with Lance. Once they met Lance they asked him for assistance or some EPO and he obliged to THEIR request.

This all seems ass backwards to me. Yea, Lance doped, but it appears to me that everyone went to him to help with their own personal doping.
Maybe I missed it as I didn't read all of the report, but can anyone enlighten me as to which riders Lance took from a clean rider and turned them into a doper??
I don't see Lance as any sort of "Doping Ring Leader" other than everyone that was already doping looked to Lance for his guidance. This only make him their self appointed ring leader.

Again - I didn't read the entire report so I could be way off base here.
Michael

Read The Secret Race. Essentially, you got on board with doping or you were out. Read up on Scott Mercier. Tyler does admit that once he took the plunge into doping, he wanted 'the good stuff' (the 'A' team), so in a sense he was 'asking' for it, but to begin with the team told him this was the way it was. Get on board with the program or you're out. Landis too, and others.

If you think Lance was going around saying "look guys, I know I'm doing all this stuff, but whether or not you do is up to you" then you're way off. Remember, cycling is a TEAM sport. It would do Lance little good if he did not have a strong team around him when trying to win the TdF, and a strong team could only come via PEDs according to USPS.
 

Prev Next