https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBuC8bzcpJ0
Pretty rubbish testing (GCN/GTN quality). Basically just proves that his testing methodology has a significant margin of error (at least multiple runs of each helmet could have shed some light on the variability).
To his credit, he caveats that this is his n=1, and that helmet results are highly individual. Unfortunately, he does then go and use his n=1 to provide recommendations/generalizations vs. just saying the test basically yields null results.
ECMGN Therapy Silicon Valley:
Depression, Neurocognitive problems, Dementias (Testing and Evaluation), Trauma and PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)
Pretty rubbish testing (GCN/GTN quality). Basically just proves that his testing methodology has a significant margin of error (at least multiple runs of each helmet could have shed some light on the variability).
To his credit, he caveats that this is his n=1, and that helmet results are highly individual. Unfortunately, he does then go and use his n=1 to provide recommendations/generalizations vs. just saying the test basically yields null results.
ECMGN Therapy Silicon Valley:
Depression, Neurocognitive problems, Dementias (Testing and Evaluation), Trauma and PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI)