In Reply To:
Agreed, but the half I did a couple years ago with a 40 mi bike, that was not marked at all, folks going off course every where, no aid stations, and no support at all on the bike....oh, it was USAT sanctioned as a half. What was even better was the run that was long by a few miles...not to hard to get an on distance run course.
Once again, as has been mentioned ad infinitum, its the
race director that is responsible for putting on a safe race, having adequately stocked and manned aid stations, having adequately marked intersections with volunteers or police, getting distances "close enough" (whatever that is), etc., etc., etc.
USAT has minimum requirements, which the vast majority of races fulfill; many of them then go above and beyond. If a race doesn't do things safely, then USAT will pull the sanction. Would it be nice if someone from USAT would go around and pre-evaluate every last race before it runs, or is on-site for the first time? Sure. But that's going to cost you a lot more than what a $30 annual membership will give you. Unless of course we get RDs like yourself that will volunteer their time to go to a race and send their neutral, non-biased opinions on to USAT.
The primary ways that USAT finds out about races is to get direct feedback from the athletes that raced them (There was a link to a survey out on their website a while ago. Even if you can't find it, there are plenty of email addresses to send to - we're all adults). Additionally, I think that if the RD chooses to have officials come to the race, they report on their observations.