Ron_Burgundy wrote:
At the same time there is a lot of local dislike here in KS about how the race has progressed with the lottery system. Our cat 1/2 road team was interested in racing but the lottery keeps us from being able to race as a team. Therefore, none of us have been interested in the race. I know a lot of guys who have raced in the past who no longer want anything to do with the race. Generally, the hype about the race over the last few years has dwindled locally. Time will tell how this race progresses and possibly this is his targeted demographic....the bucket list group.
can i present one possible other side?
is your cat 1/2 team attending as a team? socially? or is it racing as a team? tactically? because, if the latter, this is one of the outcomes of the success of this race and this platform that bothers people. it's antithetical to the vibe of gravel. they don't want pro or cat 1/2 teams swooping in to race with team tactics. they'd rather these teams stick with road. (what's left of it.)
as to the rest, it's what happens when you build a good product. you'll have to find (to start your own?) gravel race, or races, that aren't cultural phenomenons. lord knows, in michigan there are plenty. in calif, not nearly enough. so i'm starting my own. 2 of them. 1 standalone gravel, 1 a gravel tri.
meanwhile, back in emporia, this town had a 34 percent commercial vacancy rate the year the race started. now it's 8 percent. the reason why this race works is that the town feels it. and welcomes it, as far as i know. i
wrote about this a couple of months ago. there are formulas for this. sort of like for marriage. there's formulas for marriage. best practices. skills. here are two: "i'm sorry"; and "you were right." there are formulas for putting on races. but RDs don't employ known best practices any better than husbands do.
Dan Empfield
aka Slowman