I have the first iteration of the Rincon's. They fit true to size for me.

FYI, a lot of folks saying that they're only getting 200-300 miles on their Rincon's before they lose their "snappiness".

I'm only a few runs in on mine and so far, they're a fine shoe. Nice and light, but not as responsive as I was hoping.

My Rincon size is the same as my Clifton’s. I think you’ll like the Rincon...pretty good cushion and lighter weight.

Parkland


That's what frustrating about the kinvara.
I don't get a lot of miles out of them but the clifton has been better.

I switched from Clifton 5 to Rincon 2. Went for exactly the same size and all was good.

Ty. How many miles do you have on yours

What's the arch support in the Rincon compared to the Clifton?

I wear 1/2 size smaller in Rincon. Clifton 12.5, Rincon 12.

---

David
* Ironman for Life! (Blog) * IM Everyday Hero Video * Daggett Shuler Law *
Disclaimer: I have personal and professional relationships with many athletes, vendors, and organizations in the triathlon world.

I have done about 200 miles in the Rincon 2's. I dont think they will last as long as the Clifton 5, the upper and sole are less robust. This makes sense though given they are a different type of running shoe.

The arch support is more or less the same. But I find the fit of the Rincon 2 a bit more comfortable because the toe box is slightly wider compared to the Clifton 5. The bottom of the sole is also slightly wider all round.

I actually ended up buying another pair of Cliftons for long run's. I cant do long runs in the Rincon 2's, with 10miles being about the maximum range for me. If you are keeping your runs below 10miles, then the Rincon 2 works well as an everyday trainer. I would also use them for races 10k and below. But dont expect them to last as long as a pair of Cliftons.

I wear size 9 in both. I like the Cliftons more. Rincons are fine. I do wish I knew how to say it (Rin-KON? Rin-SSON?)