I'd just noticed this very recent USADA sanction of a masters cyclist. Kind of an interesting read. The order of events is a little fuzzy. But it reads like he got busted for testosterone and clomiphene. Then he tried to apply for a TUE, got rejected. Then they steered him towards an RTUE and gave him 1/4 of the usual 4-year sanction. It's possible he applied for the regular TUE before he got busted...order is fuzzy.

The funny thing is it almost reads like an advertisement for an RTUE.

At least the definition of "recreational competitor" is pretty strong. But seems hard to enforce. If this guy her places 3rd in a local crit with 40 entrants he loses his RTUE automatically?

If it is going to be socially acceptable to allow those that are transitioning from Female to Male to use T & still compete in Athletics (ex. High School Wrestler in Texas), then there certainly has to be legal grounds for discrimination if those that medically require it cannot use it to compete in Athletics as well.

I for one support the TUE as long as it precludes one from awards, prizes, & championship slots.