BigBoyND wrote:
I had the SRAM 11-26 and the jumps were great but needed more range for where I live. Now I use the Rotor Uno cassette. All of them have the 16t: 11-28, 11-30, and 11-32. The 11-28 even has a 17t after the 16t.
The big cogs are for bailout. The bigger the jumps at that end, the better. I would rather have 1t jumps up to 17t or 18t. That's why I like Uno gearing. The 17t is what I miss the most but can't give up 30t+.
I've also considered building a DA 12-30:
12,13,14,15 16,17,19,21,24,27,30
So, now that we're digressing: I was reading the dealer manual for Shimano cassettes, and based on the shift ramps, it
looked like you could take a 12-25 Ultegra and 11-28 or -30 Ultegra cassette and mash them up together. That is, the resulting 12-28 or 12-30 cassette should have the shift ramps line up correctly, e.g. the 17t cog has the proper ramp number to have a good shift to the 19t cog. I'm talking about the letter codes at the end of each of the cogs in the manual.
I tried this with a 12-25 Ultegra and 11-28 105 cassette. Now, here's where things fell apart. I kept having a poor shift from 17-19 (I think it was that one, and if not it was 19-21). I checked the cassettes again. It turns out that the 105 cassette has different ramp codes than what the dealer manual for DA and Ultegra cassettes said. I'd assumed they'd be the same, bad assumption. I think I checked the manuals for the 105 cogs' ramp codes after that incident, but I can't exactly remember what I found. I remember noting to myself that it seemed like Shimano might have made an undocumented change, but I'm not 100% sure about this.
I can tell you that the 17-19 shift was kind of not great. It would fail to shift sometimes. You can correct it by overshifting. It's definitely not the stock Shimano shift quality. I'm fussy, so I just put the full 11-28 cassette on. And yes, I hate the 15-17 gap in relatively flat terrain. And secondarily, where I ride, the last 3 cogs on the 11-30 cassettes are a bit big for me. If I were in hillier territory, I'd be much more willing to accept big gaps. As it is, I'm thinking that if I upgrade my bike to 12s, I'm ditching the 52-36 crank and going with the 50-34. It seems like they're pushing us mortals that way. It is what it is.
I do have to note, people could go Campy (in my case, back to Campy). The 12s Chorus 11-29 and 11-32 cassettes have 16t cogs. The 11s Centaur group has a 12-32 cassette. In my case, the bike has rim brakes and mechanical shifting, and I bet that Campy will be the last manufacturer to have a mechanical rim brake group, so... the thing is that it's a steel bike and I think their carbon cranks look not as good on it as Shimano's cranks, but maybe I just live with it at that point.