trimark wrote:
I think it will indeed be interesting to see how non-pro Ironman races fare. I'm guessing they'll be fine in 2015, but beyond that, who knows.
What I think most people underestimate is the impact of the pro's on things like the race expo's, what businesses book(pay) for space and so on. Then there is the whole speaking charade, pro introductions at races, pre-race dinners etc. All those things become significantly less interesting without a pro field. I wouldn't put it past sponsors to pay pro's to fly in anyway, thats much easier than having to race and hopefully the pro's will stand their ground and rather than do it for a home stay+airfare, they'll actually demand to be paid for the time it takes, say 4-days plus T&E.
Again, we can only debate from our own perspective, mine is that the pro's bought me to this sport.
Sport joins people up, it makes a community, it's about contact. It creates memories, watching big races on TV, in person creates legends, where would we be with no legends? People racing Ironman with other age groupers as legends? Maybe, but probably not. Don't you all remember doing a race with a pro?
I got to meet Leanda Cave a few times in those "race" experiences, but heck the sight of her charging towards me on the fire berm at the old Florida 70.3 course was a sight to see, yup I jumped out of the way. I remember the first person I met that was a triathlete in training for wildflower log course, she spoke about Dave Scott with such reverence that you couldn't help but be impressed, I'd never heard of him before.
So yup, all those non-pro field Ironman races are going to be deprived of that now. Can you put a price on a race that barely can differentiate itself from a local 5k, except that it takes more than 10-hours to finish? We'll see.
The flipside is how many age groupers truly know what it feels like to roll across an Ironman race as THE overall winner. It is a true age group race. I don't see these races losing anything at all.