In Reply To:
As far as you know is wrong then. I'm not even close to the max. The highest sodium losses seen at Gatorade Sports Science is 4,000mg/hour. So, over an equivalent period of time, more than double what I'd lose. And it's not like that person was several standard deviations out of the norm. I know several folks that require 500-1000mg of sodium more than I do.
OK, fair enough. Two questions though: 1) can you point me at the publication for that and 2) how does this mesh with what Tim Noakes has written about sodium replacement - as I recall he's argued very forcefully that salt loss through sweating, even at very high rates, doesn't deplete physiological sodium levels. I'm genuinely trying to work this out, not having a dig at you.
Ta
Rob
it's not published. When I was on the Timex Team, Gatorade was a sponsor. So I asked them the exact question. And that was their response. I also know a guy who was among the highest tested at GSSI - had a LOT of problems until he went and got tested - who echoed what they told me.
It doesn't mesh with what Noakes has written. But keep in mind that Noakes is the outlier. He says "you shouldn't need sodium based off XYZ." But despite the fact that athletes "shouldn't" need sodium to prevent cramping, a ton of athletes find that simply adding sodium helps prevent it. Ergo, you can take what Noakes says *should* be the case _OR_ you can look at what actually seems to work. You tell me who you are going to believe. Given that Noakes's theories - not just the salt one - are hardly universally accepted, I don't exactly consider Noakes to be much of an authority. He seems to have a lot of theories. But many of his theories seem to stand in pretty stark contrast to what actually happens.
"Non est ad astra mollis e terris via." - Seneca | rappstar.com | FB - Rappstar Racing | IG - @jordanrapp