Some preface: I have been reading a lot about Desert Dude's attempt to find the absolute best superbike in the field. It got me really intrigued to say the least. What if there was a way to compare all bikes on a point scale according to the physical aspects of the bike. For example, how important is each bike component to the average rider. Is it the groupset? The wheels, the material of the bike, the saddle? Well, if we could weight those specific variables on a 100 point scale and find a weighted average for each of those in terms of importance, then we could find a total point scale (ie a(x)+b(x)+c(x)=d))
Goal: Create a table with every single bike in the market on a 100 point scale that anyone can use to compare bikes (excluding fit)
It is very hard to explain but here is what I will ask.... What components are the most important when choosing a bike - excluding all fitting aspects.
After I receive this information, I can ask a similar question, rank these components in order from most important to least important.
If you are confused or have any other comments, don't be afraid to say something!
Updates will be posted here:
Goal: Create a table with every single bike in the market on a 100 point scale that anyone can use to compare bikes (excluding fit)
It is very hard to explain but here is what I will ask.... What components are the most important when choosing a bike - excluding all fitting aspects.
After I receive this information, I can ask a similar question, rank these components in order from most important to least important.
If you are confused or have any other comments, don't be afraid to say something!
Updates will be posted here: