Well, you haven't answered the most important question as to whether the original waiver would cover this.
Yes, you have an argument that the addition means it wasn't included before. There is an equal and opposite argument. But it's entirely moot if the original waiver covered it. If so, then the new waiver was surplusage and unnecessary and without any legal force and effect. Wouldn't be the first time some lawyer tried to boot and suspender something for no reason
And again, we sign waiver online AND at the race site for every race, and no racer has ever compared the two to see if the risks were now different and they can "back out of the deal."
Like I said, it's creative. My ,02 from reading the existing waivers you lose if you ever were to sue on it and it went to judgment
ETA Coz ain't gonna go anyway, their July "confirmation" notwithstanding
Yes, you have an argument that the addition means it wasn't included before. There is an equal and opposite argument. But it's entirely moot if the original waiver covered it. If so, then the new waiver was surplusage and unnecessary and without any legal force and effect. Wouldn't be the first time some lawyer tried to boot and suspender something for no reason
And again, we sign waiver online AND at the race site for every race, and no racer has ever compared the two to see if the risks were now different and they can "back out of the deal."
Like I said, it's creative. My ,02 from reading the existing waivers you lose if you ever were to sue on it and it went to judgment
ETA Coz ain't gonna go anyway, their July "confirmation" notwithstanding