All: perhaps this is old news and there are other threads, if so, my apologies.
I had total disappointmt with the combined Ironman and 70.3 racers/athlretes at Ironman Whistler. As an Ironman athlete I felt it was distracting and congested. Perhaps it was because I was going for a slot to Kona and it was hard to tell who your competitors were and were not and the abundant walking.
I don't know if was the 70.3 athletes walking or the Ironman athletes, but it seemed like the majority were 70.3 athletes. I felt like walking encouraged walking, which is fine and no shame, I walked at times, but it was distracting. I don't ever remember that much walking in other Ironmans. I am fully aware it could have been the Ironman athletes walking and not the 70.3.
Bottom line: is there a consensus out there (other than from WTC) i f the athletes like the combined races and for me, I will not do a combined Ironman race with a 70.3, but I would do a 70.3 combined with and Ironman. I am not hating, I am just trying to see what the majority think?
Thanks!!
I had total disappointmt with the combined Ironman and 70.3 racers/athlretes at Ironman Whistler. As an Ironman athlete I felt it was distracting and congested. Perhaps it was because I was going for a slot to Kona and it was hard to tell who your competitors were and were not and the abundant walking.
I don't know if was the 70.3 athletes walking or the Ironman athletes, but it seemed like the majority were 70.3 athletes. I felt like walking encouraged walking, which is fine and no shame, I walked at times, but it was distracting. I don't ever remember that much walking in other Ironmans. I am fully aware it could have been the Ironman athletes walking and not the 70.3.
Bottom line: is there a consensus out there (other than from WTC) i f the athletes like the combined races and for me, I will not do a combined Ironman race with a 70.3, but I would do a 70.3 combined with and Ironman. I am not hating, I am just trying to see what the majority think?
Thanks!!