The whole religious/political protest thing likely came about as a result of the finish of the Olympic marathon in Rio (I forget the specifics whether it was a flag, an armband or a salute in that incident, but the jist was that ultimately the athlete had to seek asylum to not return home where there was a fair chance that he would be executed...)...
How the sexual orientation line item got amended into the rule this year I have no idea, other than that some could argue that in several countries it could indeed be a political statement. I know that since the political protest rule came in, there may have been incidents at races, where people have grabbed Pride flags or protest banners relating to sexual orientation crossing the finish line, that have led to some people in attendance pressure to have this rule applied. In the cases that I am aware of, the head referee did not issue a DSQ. In a discussion with a number of officials, there was not a unanimous consensus as to how the rule would apply to such cases, this uncertainty may have contributed to why this was explicitly included in the rule?
The arguments about colors on the race suit are moot, given ITU uniform rules, in order to get into the whole pride rainbow situation, it would literally have to be the countries official kit design (which if it were to happen, would be an incredibly fascinating situation to see whether the kit was or wasn't approved). Now in terms of sponsor logo spaces, with sponsors potentially being religious or politically minded groups, I have no idea what might happen here, currently the only logos that are banned are companies producing tobacco, spirits or products containing substances on the WADA banned list, so based on that, my guess would be nothing at the moment (the next revision will be after the Tokyo games in 2020, so it'll be interesting to see what happens between now and then). In terms of grabbing a flag at the finish, I personally see no issue with that (political protest banners relating to sexual orientation on the other hand are already covered by the prior rule), although could see the political protest angle on it if said race were in a country where it was illegal. It'll be interesting to see how this is applied in the coming season.
So I'm not sure that this rule actually changes that much. I can certainly see how the wording raises some eyebrows, but in terms of how things are officiated, I suspect very little will change. What the wording will do is provide some clarity to competition juries, should there be any decisions in races against this rule, and protests or appeals relating to them.
How the sexual orientation line item got amended into the rule this year I have no idea, other than that some could argue that in several countries it could indeed be a political statement. I know that since the political protest rule came in, there may have been incidents at races, where people have grabbed Pride flags or protest banners relating to sexual orientation crossing the finish line, that have led to some people in attendance pressure to have this rule applied. In the cases that I am aware of, the head referee did not issue a DSQ. In a discussion with a number of officials, there was not a unanimous consensus as to how the rule would apply to such cases, this uncertainty may have contributed to why this was explicitly included in the rule?
The arguments about colors on the race suit are moot, given ITU uniform rules, in order to get into the whole pride rainbow situation, it would literally have to be the countries official kit design (which if it were to happen, would be an incredibly fascinating situation to see whether the kit was or wasn't approved). Now in terms of sponsor logo spaces, with sponsors potentially being religious or politically minded groups, I have no idea what might happen here, currently the only logos that are banned are companies producing tobacco, spirits or products containing substances on the WADA banned list, so based on that, my guess would be nothing at the moment (the next revision will be after the Tokyo games in 2020, so it'll be interesting to see what happens between now and then). In terms of grabbing a flag at the finish, I personally see no issue with that (political protest banners relating to sexual orientation on the other hand are already covered by the prior rule), although could see the political protest angle on it if said race were in a country where it was illegal. It'll be interesting to see how this is applied in the coming season.
So I'm not sure that this rule actually changes that much. I can certainly see how the wording raises some eyebrows, but in terms of how things are officiated, I suspect very little will change. What the wording will do is provide some clarity to competition juries, should there be any decisions in races against this rule, and protests or appeals relating to them.