zoom wrote:
Those who followed the IMLou's swim times earlier this year can attest to the funky swim time, where it seemed like it was reporting the clock time and not chip time. It was later on corrected. That Sportstats guy even came into the forum to tell everyone to hold their horses while they worked out the glitch. The technology isn't perfect.
Having timed a couple of races myself I have to say that it is unfortunate but S*** happens. They miss times in this case it looks like the maps missed you the first time around and picked you up the second time around. How and why? Lots of reasons it could happen. With the bib chips, numbers on the back don't read all the time, miss most people going faster. If the chips are wet they are sometimes less effective, or if they are pressed against your skin. Some of this depends on the technology: low frequency such as champion chip systems don't work well if the chips are in your pocket or on your arm distance, but the lower frequencies deal with insulating disturbances better. Higher frequency stuff (such as chrono track systems) don't work as well with insulating disturbances but without such blockages work so well that the chip starts being read at upwards of 30ft away.
Congrats on your race!
---------------------
Jordan Oroshiba --- Roadie invading Triathlete space for knowledge access