Jae K wrote:
ericlambi wrote:
Sbernardi wrote:
Well.. after hearing from an expert, people got quiet about their opinions.
As for off topic, I think the thread is called IM AZ not 70.3. So one could interject that you are off topic. And the 1/2 has never had anywhere close to 3000 people
Sorry, what do you want people to say? All I heard was someone that thinks other people shouldn’t do a triathlon with significant social distancing measures in place, but that it’s okay for them to shop indoors (with a mask!) and dine outdoors. Both of which are comparably risky to said triathlon.
False equivalence.
What is the quality of exposure, quantity and duration?
Social distance, hygiene, and masks are helpful in reducing infection but imperfect.
In IM events, several hundreds to thousands of people coalesce from having traveled nationally and internationally, encountering innumerable people in airplanes, hotels, functions, with a high intensivity of regional/national/international contacts over several days. If you are “rolling the dice” per se for each individual exposure, how many times is the dice being rolled, exponentially compounded by the number of athletes, volunteers, industry and hospitality participants? I am not just talking about the buzz-by on the bike from non-draft distances.
And all this occurring while COVID-19 infections are on the rise nationally and internationally, with a resurgence at a time when we need the pandemic controlled the most—before winter and flu season, when clinical diagnoses will be confounded, heath care stressed, and populations less able to distance. You mock masks (not OK and irresponsible), or maybe just mocking me (funny, and OK)—standard “surgical-style” masks are only about 40% effective, but when both participants are wearing masks, protection is increased, and when distanced, protected even further. Why do you think we wear these “less effective” masks when performing surgical procedures?—it is primarily to prevent us, the operator, from spreading our germs to the patient—very good for that function, and less so for personal protection (which is the arena of N95 or higher, respirator masks). By wearing any type of mask or face covering, we are showing that we care for the well-being of people around us amid a pandemic. It is unfortunate N95 masks are not widely available—they are prioritized for health care settings. For personal use, we use KN-95 masks, which are not used in US health care and are widely available—not quite as good as N95, but generally more protective than standard masks and face coverings.
I’ll stop posting on this matter.
Take care. Wishing you all well.
The part of your post in bold I completely agree with in terms of people traveling, gathering and exposure before the event, but that is not exclusive to Ironman events. Did you see NFL games with people in stands? Do you think all those people live next door to the stadium and slept in their own beds and ate in their own kitchen? What you said applies to all kind of business, cultural and other events going on around the world right now.
So I think your opposition is a generic discussion against events going on, which is fine, but don't pick on ironman for trying to run their biz if the local authorities deem it safe. Here where I live, Ironman would have no chance to run an event even though our numbers are better than Arizona